nba.fanhouse.com— Kobe Bryant scored 26 points and Pau Gasol neared a triple-double Tuesday as the Los Angeles Lakers thumped the Boston Celtics 89-67 to force Game 7 in the NBA Finals.
Jun 16, 2010View in Crawl 4
Boston already got dominated in Staples and came back with a win the next game so it's not over yet.Lakers just need the same level of energy and all around scoring contributions though and they will be champs again.
Good idea get the hell out of there for a while. The thing that the Lakers fans might do for sure win or lose is look for the Celtics bus and just mess with it. Payback for doing the same to the Lakers in 2008.
No, it's not bad. In fact, I think we wouldn't have seen these Lakers on Tuesday if we hadn't seen those Lakers the prior 2 games...we just need to see these Lakers ONE MORE TIME!
firesights,Jordan didn't need to have a great offensive post player. Him and the rest of his team had plenty of firepower to score. Jordan with Shaq on his team would have been no better than Kobe and Shaq together. Shaq was a great player back then, but it was his prime time and he felt the ball needed to go through him all the time. How do you think that would have played out any differently if he had Jordan instead of Kobe? It wouldn't have been any different....Shaq would have still cried to get the ball and not share the limelight with Jordan. In fact, Kobe was the PERFECT person to team with Shaq because even though Kobe could do it all offensively, he still had to accept and did accept the idea that the post player was the main outlet. Jordan in his prime would not have accepted the fact that Shaq would have been higher on the food chain than him.
dushJun 16, 2010
Boston already got dominated in Staples and came back with a win the next game so it's not over yet.Lakers just need the same level of energy and all around scoring contributions though and they will be champs again.
one1plus1oneJun 16, 2010
"Digg me down" Ok, as you wish: I dugg you down.
odinthorJun 16, 2010
The Washington Generals were able to make the necessary half-time adjustments for the first time in 58 years.
gregus1032Jun 16, 2010
People would care if the teams played to win instead of playing to not lose.
rjlaframboiseJun 16, 2010
Couldn't agree more. I get so tired of people searching for the next Jordan or the next Gretzky, etc.
Closed AccountJun 16, 2010
Good idea get the hell out of there for a while. The thing that the Lakers fans might do for sure win or lose is look for the Celtics bus and just mess with it. Payback for doing the same to the Lakers in 2008.
ltogamiJun 16, 2010
Lakers will dominate Game 7!! It will be their 16th Championship!!
yeahwhatever58Jun 17, 2010
No, it's not bad. In fact, I think we wouldn't have seen these Lakers on Tuesday if we hadn't seen those Lakers the prior 2 games...we just need to see these Lakers ONE MORE TIME!
yeahwhatever58Jun 17, 2010
firesights,Jordan didn't need to have a great offensive post player. Him and the rest of his team had plenty of firepower to score. Jordan with Shaq on his team would have been no better than Kobe and Shaq together. Shaq was a great player back then, but it was his prime time and he felt the ball needed to go through him all the time. How do you think that would have played out any differently if he had Jordan instead of Kobe? It wouldn't have been any different....Shaq would have still cried to get the ball and not share the limelight with Jordan. In fact, Kobe was the PERFECT person to team with Shaq because even though Kobe could do it all offensively, he still had to accept and did accept the idea that the post player was the main outlet. Jordan in his prime would not have accepted the fact that Shaq would have been higher on the food chain than him.
ardatorresJun 21, 2010
The Finals of Lakers vs Celtics was a good match! It was a good game! Congratulations to both who did their best!More about the game? <a class="user" href="http://www.pinoylive.net/index.php/2010/06/20/the-16th-championship-title-for-lakers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pinoylive.net/index.php/2010/06/20/the- ...</a>