latimesblogs.latimes.com— "Jackass" star Johnny Knoxville was cited at Los Angeles International Airport this morning for allegedly trying to bring an inert grenade into a plane.
Jan 15, 2009View in Crawl 4
syntaxgs:Burning, which is what the powder in the grenade does (at an extremely fast rate, making it explosive), is a chemical reaction.Go back to chemistry 101, then come back and say grenades don't have chemical reactions.<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combustion">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combustion</a>Quote: "Combustion or burning is a complex sequence of exothermic CHEMICAL REACTIONS..."
@giskard88"an inert grenade is just as effective a weapon to hijack a plane as a real one. it's not like someone would ask him to prove it's real."Your thinking is truly scary! You want to arrest him, but not for trying to hijack a plane or attempting to smuggle in an explosive, but for bringing in something which he could have made people believe was a live grenade had he wished to hijack the plane? That doesn't scare the hell out of you -- wanting to arrest a television personality that you absolutely know had no intention of hijacking the plane because, had he been a totally different person, the device he had with him could have been used to hijack the plane?Fine. Then I want to arrest you because, had you been a completely different person who was a pedophile, your penis could have been used to rape a child.Or maybe the TSA could arrest you for carrying on some paperback books and a cell phone -- because you could stuff the books under your shirt and come out of the lavatory holding your cell phone, convincing the crew that you had an explosive device under your shirt.
tripleplay2425Jan 16, 2009
syntaxgs:Burning, which is what the powder in the grenade does (at an extremely fast rate, making it explosive), is a chemical reaction.Go back to chemistry 101, then come back and say grenades don't have chemical reactions.<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combustion">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combustion</a>Quote: "Combustion or burning is a complex sequence of exothermic CHEMICAL REACTIONS..."
Closed AccountJan 16, 2009
It doesn't make a bit of difference, guys, the grenade is inert.
Closed AccountJan 16, 2009
What in the f**k does that even mean?
habbofreshJan 16, 2009
just ... Wow.
Closed AccountJan 17, 2009
@giskard88"an inert grenade is just as effective a weapon to hijack a plane as a real one. it's not like someone would ask him to prove it's real."Your thinking is truly scary! You want to arrest him, but not for trying to hijack a plane or attempting to smuggle in an explosive, but for bringing in something which he could have made people believe was a live grenade had he wished to hijack the plane? That doesn't scare the hell out of you -- wanting to arrest a television personality that you absolutely know had no intention of hijacking the plane because, had he been a totally different person, the device he had with him could have been used to hijack the plane?Fine. Then I want to arrest you because, had you been a completely different person who was a pedophile, your penis could have been used to rape a child.Or maybe the TSA could arrest you for carrying on some paperback books and a cell phone -- because you could stuff the books under your shirt and come out of the lavatory holding your cell phone, convincing the crew that you had an explosive device under your shirt.
douglasqJan 17, 2009
Hehehe, Muslim Jackass.
magnus150Jan 20, 2009
I'd say his career is about as inert as that grenade.Which is very inert indeed.
drewbear1964Nov 27, 2009
Hahaha lol very funny!
Closed AccountMay 24, 2011
No, he meant to bring a snake instead.