prisonplanet.com — At a recent speaking engagement in Austin Texas, Senator John Kerry responded to a question about WTC Building 7 by concluding that according to his information, the building was brought down as a result of a controlled demolition, directly contradicting the official line that the structure fell as a result of fire and debris damage.
Apr 23, 2007 View in Crawl 4
dshplsApr 23, 2007
F damnit, why are you people making me a republican? I don't like repubs at all.....but now I really dislike democrats.
lasthorsemanApr 23, 2007
They did 911They did ImusThey did Virgina Tech too. It's not the "right" and it's not the "left" it's merely a corporate policy change and if you don't like it, that's too bad.
goodseedApr 23, 2007
Senator Kerry,Silverstein lied. What firefighter in their right mind would go into a raging inferno to set demolition charges?I guess they must have been pre-installed.
sil5erApr 24, 2007
hint: Use BitTorrent instead, its harder to censor than Google Video, right? ......
deltromdusApr 24, 2007
Classic politician bulls**t. Doesn't even consider his previous statement, knowing probably only a few people would pick it out.
sqru2Apr 24, 2007
He looked uncomfortable with the subject and I find it hard to believe that nobody in Mass. has raised 9/11 truth topics to him.I think if he were to start speaking about 9/11 it could bring broaderawareness mainstream but he could surely become a straw man and get "swift boated" on it. Besides,he is a skull & bones member and if I'm not mistaken ,he killed the investigation of BCCI bank which was connected to the bushes,binladens,james baker,carter,opec,pakistan,etc.
theferruccioMay 3, 2007
"Whether Kerry is basing his response on inside knowledge or hearsay is largely irrelevant"So, the possibility that Kerry might have been wrong is irrelevant?
theferruccioMay 3, 2007
Really? They came down at freefall speed? Says who? Loose Change? From the pictures I've seen, I see debris from the surrounding destruction that was billowing out from the WTC collapses lower than the middle of the tower. It seems that the freefalling debris should be a good reference point to base how fast the building is falling.
theferruccioMay 3, 2007
*McCormick Center in Chicago, Sight and Sound Theatre in Pennsylvania. Look it up.Here's more info on the McCormick Center fire<a class="user" href="http://www.extraalarm.org/broadcast/chicago/McCormick/McCormick_Place.htm">http://www.extraalarm.org/broadcast/chicago/McCormick/McCormick_Place.htm</a>*Steel loses over 50% of its strength at 1100F, the buildings were burning at around 1800F*Fun question. Apples and Oranges. Different damage in different locations. Different structures with different framework. Burned uncontrolled? Define "uncontrolled" and "controlled" WTC 7 certainly was not a controlled fire. (Yes, it was on fire)<a class="user" href="http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/06-09-11images/fig3.jpg">http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/06-09-11images/fig3.jpg</a>
bravolimaJul 9, 2007
Punch your ticket for life...Ever heard of Life Without Parole?That's worse than any deaththreatwhich was only made in your mind!