answers.yahoo.com — Earlier today someone posted a question on "ask yahoo" requesting why Ron Paul was not included in their candidates list. The question no longer exists:http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ArWYaB3WCzJ7FudZWIvfBvnsy6IX?qid=20070508101117AAgfaoyhave some pics about it : http://msmsmackdown.blogspot.com/2007/05/some-nice-pics.html
May 9, 2007 View in Crawl 4
metrodextrousMay 9, 2007
it isn't just digg. stop thinking that digg is the center of the universe. i am sitting here with two 65-year olds talking about ron paul and how he is going to change the world.
paullevMay 9, 2007
Old media like ABC don't get today's online world. You'd think the newer media like Yahoo would, but when they get that big, the same kind of frightened thinking sets in. Here and here, a few operations are seeing the light (like CNN, in its decision to make debate footage available). But it's a slow process. <a class="user" href="http://www.paullevinson.net/archives/cnn_seeing_the_light.phtml">http://www.paullevinson.net/archives/cnn_seeing_the_light.phtml</a>
Closed AccountMay 9, 2007
Get over it! Yahoo is a reputatble site. Ron Paul is a joke. He knows he is not going to win. amazingly, you don't realize that obvious fact. Yahooo is not going to waste time on the comic relief of this election.
thomaspaine23May 9, 2007Submitter
hdtvdustIrrelevant whether they win or not. Like I said, 15 minutes of their time to add Paul and Gravel on their candidates list and I'm happy. Simple fix. They have no business deciding who is viable. End of story.
larethdfMay 9, 2007
Yahoo is currently telling anyone who calls that Ron Paul is not a declared candidate. Apparently their old argument that he is not popular enough wasn't working.
wvernon1981May 15, 2007
Ron Paul is now on the Yahoo Presidential Page