I don't think you've actually f**king looked at her, have you? I mean, she's completely average looking. Maybe just a bit attractive, but she is miles away from being beautiful.
Also, just to add to how you're wrong...You conspiracy theorists are all the same. You only look at the information that you want to look at. I presented the fact that Bill Gates has expressed his interest in philantropy as early as 1994, yet you don't acknowledge it.I don't want to argue with you, you're so f**king set in your ways that there's no sense in trying to convince you.Honestly, I applaud the work that Bill and Melinda Gates are doing with their foundation. They are eliminating diseases and funding some of the best high schools in the nation. But, because you're itching for a fight, you want to see them as villians when they are actually the most charitable people in the world
First, the f word doesn't make you cool. Nobody said she's beautiful. However, it doesn't take a woman a lot to be in a league above bill. I can't understand what she could have found attractive about him other than wealth and lifestyle. Some women without stellar character choose this route, like Anna Nicole.Bill and Melinda constantly paraphrase Spiderman when they say "With great power comes great responsibility." See: <a class="user" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0145487/quotes">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0145487/quotes</a>I say they are open to greater scrutiny as well. I think it's wise to know people who are in a position to change the course of the world.Actually Mary Gates, civic leader and bill's mom, told Melinda in a letter before her death: “From those to whom much is given, much is expected.” The Bill and Melinda Gates foundation does have remarkable accomplishments and plans. But this does not explain her involvement with the Bilderberg Group (<a class="user" href="http://bilderberg.org)">http://bilderberg.org)</a> or her attendance at the 2004 Bilderberg Group meeting:Guests at the 2004 Bilderberg Meeting included John Edwards, James Wolfensohn, Melinda Gates, and Mario Draghi. (<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_attendees)">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_attendees)</a>I'm just not a fan of secret societies that control world affairs: Global warming decisions, Middle east portrayal and propaganda in the media, Oil price manipulation, Dollar and Euro control, foreign investment and trade, Eugenics (<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics),">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics),</a> NWO. It's okay for these people to make decisions, but it's not okay for it to be done in secret, when it might not be in the best interest of most of the population of the world.I don't trust Clinton, Bushs, Kerry, Henry John Heinz III (John Kerry's wife's ex-husband) because they all were in Skull and Bones, a secret society, derived from the Eugenics Society (see: <a class="user" href="http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/07/344113.html).">http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/07/344113.html).</a> All those people can point at "good deeds" for public relations. But, since they each are associated with a sinister "secret society" it makes sense not to trust them, until they either disassociate or explain their association. The same applies to Melinda French.And, I did not ignore your question about Bill's desire to be a philanthropist prior to his marriage to Melinda French. As you said, Bill expressed interest in philanthropy in 1994. That was when he was engaged and married to Melinda French and could be due to her influence and reasons. What about Bill during the long period between 1955 and 1994?
lumirasJul 23, 2006
I don't think you've actually f**king looked at her, have you? I mean, she's completely average looking. Maybe just a bit attractive, but she is miles away from being beautiful.
lumirasJul 23, 2006
Also, just to add to how you're wrong...You conspiracy theorists are all the same. You only look at the information that you want to look at. I presented the fact that Bill Gates has expressed his interest in philantropy as early as 1994, yet you don't acknowledge it.I don't want to argue with you, you're so f**king set in your ways that there's no sense in trying to convince you.Honestly, I applaud the work that Bill and Melinda Gates are doing with their foundation. They are eliminating diseases and funding some of the best high schools in the nation. But, because you're itching for a fight, you want to see them as villians when they are actually the most charitable people in the world
Closed AccountJul 26, 2006Submitter
First, the f word doesn't make you cool. Nobody said she's beautiful. However, it doesn't take a woman a lot to be in a league above bill. I can't understand what she could have found attractive about him other than wealth and lifestyle. Some women without stellar character choose this route, like Anna Nicole.Bill and Melinda constantly paraphrase Spiderman when they say "With great power comes great responsibility." See: <a class="user" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0145487/quotes">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0145487/quotes</a>I say they are open to greater scrutiny as well. I think it's wise to know people who are in a position to change the course of the world.Actually Mary Gates, civic leader and bill's mom, told Melinda in a letter before her death: “From those to whom much is given, much is expected.” The Bill and Melinda Gates foundation does have remarkable accomplishments and plans. But this does not explain her involvement with the Bilderberg Group (<a class="user" href="http://bilderberg.org)">http://bilderberg.org)</a> or her attendance at the 2004 Bilderberg Group meeting:Guests at the 2004 Bilderberg Meeting included John Edwards, James Wolfensohn, Melinda Gates, and Mario Draghi. (<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_attendees)">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_attendees)</a>I'm just not a fan of secret societies that control world affairs: Global warming decisions, Middle east portrayal and propaganda in the media, Oil price manipulation, Dollar and Euro control, foreign investment and trade, Eugenics (<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics),">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics),</a> NWO. It's okay for these people to make decisions, but it's not okay for it to be done in secret, when it might not be in the best interest of most of the population of the world.I don't trust Clinton, Bushs, Kerry, Henry John Heinz III (John Kerry's wife's ex-husband) because they all were in Skull and Bones, a secret society, derived from the Eugenics Society (see: <a class="user" href="http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/07/344113.html).">http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/07/344113.html).</a> All those people can point at "good deeds" for public relations. But, since they each are associated with a sinister "secret society" it makes sense not to trust them, until they either disassociate or explain their association. The same applies to Melinda French.And, I did not ignore your question about Bill's desire to be a philanthropist prior to his marriage to Melinda French. As you said, Bill expressed interest in philanthropy in 1994. That was when he was engaged and married to Melinda French and could be due to her influence and reasons. What about Bill during the long period between 1955 and 1994?
viper9864Aug 7, 2007
This video confirms almost everything I said a year ago. <a class="user" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyNo7r5wrm0">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyNo7r5wrm0</a>