view.nowpublic.com — Steorn's technology is based on the interaction of magnetic fields and allows the production of clean, free and constant energy. The technology can be applied to virtually all devices requiring energy, from cellular phones to cars.
Aug 18, 2006 View in Crawl 4
staydeadAug 19, 2006
Does this guy know he can get an easy $1 million for his device? Without even giving up any rights to it?All he has to do is have it tested. He can even decide what kind of test he wants as long as that test proves his claim.You'd think everyone with such a device would be lining up to get that money. Oh wait, they aren't because these things don't actually work.Feel your perpetual motion device works. Step up to the plate and get a cool million.<a class="user" href="http://www.randi.org/research/index.html">http://www.randi.org/research/index.html</a>
panzerfinder15Aug 19, 2006
OMG the world was never flat!!!! The ancient Greeks were within a few thousand miles to how big and round the earth was. The catholics never believed the earth was flat either...that's why the pope holds a ball with a cross in his hand...it's the earth...a globe!!! If they believed the earth was flat then the pope would be holding a pizza with a cross on it. If you don't believe me, look it up!!!! I don't mean to flout this but I'm a senior history major and the intellects of any society since the greeks NEVER believed the earth flat, including the religious intellects. So please, before you say that the religious people made people believe the earth was flat and suppressed religion, please get your facts straight!!!! then again, they did believe the earth was the center of the universe...which the new Anthropic Principle also supports!!!!!!!! Go science!<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle</a>
Closed AccountAug 19, 2006
true - you'll never get as much energy from a water whell as was used to raise the water up to where it falls from, and solar energy is what evaporates it and raises it up.
Closed AccountAug 19, 2006
I have proved them wrong. I challenge them to prove I haven't.
therockheadAug 19, 2006
Famous Irish Scientists<a class="user" href="http://understandingscience.ucc.ie/pages/irishscientists.htm">http://understandingscience.ucc.ie/pages/irishscientists.htm</a>
calebcharlesAug 20, 2006
And to think, I read EVERY frickin comment.
Closed AccountAug 20, 2006
We don't know that it's perpetual, silly.
Closed AccountAug 20, 2006
"Me? 99% convinced it's a viral marketing/attentiongetting/hoaxish phuckaround, 1% hopeful maybe this is something else..."Damn, you're gullible.
tiakAug 21, 2006
"However, do bear in mind that in every chemical reaction you did in high school or college, in a closed system, that released heat or light also lost weight (just not enough to measure)."Umm, I'm sorry, but I beg to differ... Unless of course said experiment was giving off a gass, which on some level of course it likely was, but say it's a completely closed system and it isn't, then this is plainly wrong. When something loses chemical energy, it isn't losing mass, simply using a stored form of potential energy that was put into it when bonds were formed. No mass is created or destroyed in these experiments, energy is simply converted....
bocusAug 21, 2006
There have been a couple of instrumental Irish scientists Boyle, Bool and Callan just to name 3! :)
endoquixoteAug 23, 2006
My idea is to give amphetimines to animals on treadmills