thinkprogress.org — (Video) Prominent neocon Norman Podhoretz, who has just published an essay titled ?The Case For Bombing Iran," admits in an interview that "if we were to bomb the Iranians as I hope and pray we will, we?ll unleash a wave of anti-Americanism all over the world that will make the anti-Americanism we?ve experienced so far look like a lovefest.?
Jun 20, 2007 View in Crawl 4
toddcatJun 22, 2007
You're only asking that now? :)
wayoftheironpawJun 22, 2007
Fundamentalism, in this case, the Christian variety, is what fuels a lust for war. It divides the world into good and evil based on one's choice of imaginary friend. Atheists are much more rational in their actions, and less likely to support war.
privateguyJun 23, 2007
No s**t! I guess 879 diggers wouldn't have ever known this if you hadn't posted it.
franky66Jun 23, 2007
One canidate voted against the mess in Iraq from the beginning, one wanted to go after Bin Ladin and his organization without policing the world. One canidate is against striking Iran and starting WWIII. One canidate holds the US constitution close to his heart and always votes accordingly. Were does you canidate stand on going into Iran? Where were they on Iraq? Where are they now? Alot of folks whould be suprised if they would stop watching TV and do some research. Forget party lines...there both corrupt, who is the only canidate that doesn't vote with the party lines? Please look into these things and the choices become clear America.
franky66Jun 24, 2007
Only one canidate running voted against the war in Iraq from the beginning and wanted to go after Bin Ladin instead, without policing the world. Only one canidate stands up against this war in Iran, the start of WWIII. One canidate is a firm upholder of the US Constitution. Do some research, we need some new leadership in this country...the choice is clear.
g0nzillaJun 26, 2007
I did not vote Mr Blair into power and I did protest against the war.
thecoolestguyJun 27, 2007
It's almost like these Zionist Jews WANT more anti-semitism to create a siege-like mentality among the Jewish population.
Closed AccountOct 18, 2007
Sadam would not have been in power in 1990 without the help of Rumsfeld, Bush 1 and the CIA throughout the 80's...so it is kinda silly to say that "striking the Osirak reactor in 1983 because it deprived Sadam of Nuclear weapons". Don't you agree? I mean sure there could have been other good reasons to strike the nulear reactor, but look at the situation in the Mid-east right now. It is not good. Don't you think that Israelie/American foreign policy was pretty crappy over the last 30 years if the result is what we are left with right now? Kinda like "the world to end all wars" WW I was a complete and utter failure given what had to occur in WWII.