thelegality.com — Wikileaks may very well be unstoppable. That didn't prevent a federal judge from vastly overstepping his authority while attempting the impossible. This article offers a description of some of the Constitutional issues presented in the lawsuit.
Feb 27, 2008 View in Crawl 4
Closed AccountFeb 28, 2008
also your example, whistle blower laws wouldn't have an effect on, for the simple fact that your refusing to sign an NDA over wages. Labor laws might have a say in whether you get fired or not, but that all depends on the state you live in. Federal discrimination laws wouldn't help you either.
truzseekerFeb 28, 2008
That means judges and courts can't conceal a cover-up that has no evidential threshold like probable cause. One having knowledge of the concealment can join the judge's conspiracy and report same to any grand jury per 18 USC 3501 on behalf of dirty parties or feds.
khastFeb 28, 2008
Society has changed over the last 30 years. Back before the internet, employees were told to keep secrets. Oops, something leaked...it wasn't that big of a deal...yeah it was...but it wasn't like it couldn't be stopped.Now, if something leaks, you have approximately the time between the leak, until that person has access to the internet. Literally leaks can spread around the world in a matter of minutes...before anyone even knows there has been a leak.The world has to adapt to this, as the internet is hard enough to censor, and new technologies makes it that much harder.Yeah, what good does it really do to order a DNS server to not resolve an IP address.....if the IP address is accessible just by typing it in....really.
bjornskiFeb 28, 2008
"Landholders ought to have a share in the government, to support these invaluable interests and to balance and check the other. They ought to be so constituted as to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority" -James Madison
bjornskiFeb 28, 2008
Aaah, $cientology tactics, huh?Have you stopped molesting your neighbors children? Why don't go door to door and ask everyone in your neighborhood?
davidfryFeb 29, 2008
The Judge is Jeffrey White - <a class="user" href="http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/tGetInfo?jid=2973">http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/tGetInfo?jid=2973</a>
derek20caliFeb 29, 2008
Facts have no place here!
Closed AccountFeb 29, 2008
So a newspaper or tabloid prints a damning article and they get...a hand slap, a fine, a chance to argue in court. A website, perhaps someones bread and butter, gets ripped out from the socket before one even knows about it. Where is the justice and equality in that? Whatever happened to habius Corpus and similar concepts or Innocent until proven guilty and representation? Is it me or do Americans and American judges assume too much and take way too much for granted? After all, are both not a place to inform, to communicate and to represent those who don't know? to Spread information.....If its wrong then let a jury decide, let the people at least be represented!
lolo2007Jun 24, 2008
interestingly enough I read the entire u.s. constitution about a week ago. As I did I couldn't help but see so many areas in my life where my constitutional right (so called) are tread upon daily. I wish people would get on the RP train. I will continue to support all Constitutionally restricted candidates.<a class="user" href="http://vb.paramegsoft.com/12907.html">http://vb.paramegsoft.com/12907.html</a><a class="user" href="http://vb.paramegsoft.com/12921.html">http://vb.paramegsoft.com/12921.html</a><a class="user" href="http://girls.paramegsoft.com/">http://girls.paramegsoft.com/</a><a class="user" href="http://www.paramegsoft.com/">http://www.paramegsoft.com/</a>