engadget.com — Interestingly enough, the system supposedly relies on "modified software" running on regular WiFi equipment, and wireless access points with the newfangled software can seemingly daisy-chain directional network traffic through "several carefully aligned steerable antennas in order to eventually reach a fiber link connected to the internet.
Mar 27, 2007 View in Crawl 4
podgey22Mar 28, 2007
So you're saying blogspam is fine if the site is big enough? Bollocks to that. Lets just stick to the original sources, not ones that regurgitate the same content with "[link]" at the bottom. AFAIK, Cnet deserve the traffic for this, not Engadget.
kryptonite514Mar 28, 2007
I agree. I'm not sure what's so special about this.
laneMar 28, 2007
this would be great to start your own IPTV station without having to be charged for the obscene amount of bandwidth it would consume
caseyucfMar 28, 2007
guess what podgey... there's ads on cnet too! OMG!!!why do you care if you read the article on cnet vs engadget?
akira117Mar 28, 2007
Like water down an internet drain..... :D
omgcthulhuMay 1, 2007
I don't, don't agree and I don't believe. This simply won't work!
uchimalbanishMay 14, 2007
Nice indeed. What an epatage!
mhmdkhamisOct 13, 2007
<a class="user" href="http://girls.paramegsoft.com/">http://girls.paramegsoft.com/</a>great<a class="user" href="http://www.paramegsoft.com/forum/">http://www.paramegsoft.com/forum/</a>