thinkprogress.org — On CBS’s Face the Nation, a perplexed and stunned Rice said, “The idea of launching preemptive strikes into Afghanistan in July of 2001, this is a new fact.” Rice then said, “I don’t know what we were supposed to preemptively strike in Afghanistan. Perhaps somebody can ask that.” Watch it
Apr 29, 2007 View in Crawl 4
jackelsmackApr 29, 2007
Secretary Bamboozleeza strikes again. Would you care for some Cream of Mushroom-Cloud Soup madame? It's served in our finest aluminum tubes... goes well with our featured specialty: Pork fillets stuffed with Lies."We were fighting terrorists? Afghanistan is a country? The CIA does what now? Are you asking me these questions because I'm black?"
aldenhgApr 30, 2007
I think a better question might be why no one in the Bush administration has been brought up on charges of treason or at least impeached. There really is overwhelming evidence that Iraq didn't have WMDs, was not connected to 9/11 in any way (Bush himself admitted this) and wasn't an imminent threat. The trail of corruption goes so far up the ass of the government that it can see teeth.
cybersallyApr 30, 2007
I think she still believes Iraq is at fault for 9/11.
strictlyApr 30, 2007
This whole administration is criminal and incompetent. They should all be tried for war crimes and imprisoned.
doctorfungiApr 30, 2007
7 years of doing nothing is worse than 7 months of doing nothing.
aldenhgApr 30, 2007
But Clinton didn't do nothing. He threw missile after missile at Bin Laden, but everyone said he was trying to wag the dog off of the whole Lewinsky thing. The big difference between Clinton and Bush is that Clinton didn't get distracted from his swron duty to his country every time someone jingled their keys.