news.bbc.co.uk — The descendants of the genetic upper class would be tall, slim, healthy, attractive, intelligent, and creative and a far cry from the "underclass" humans who would have evolved into dim-witted, ugly, squat goblin-like creatures.
Oct 17, 2006 View in Crawl 4
darkamster07Oct 17, 2006
this guy is a f**king jock metal poser! he is not true metal. he hangs around with fat wanabe goth chicks! I hope he reads this! hahaha!
iamdwOct 17, 2006
Despite whether i believe this may or may not be the true evolution, i just had to digg it for the description...
furioshonenOct 18, 2006
This is the most stupidest crap I have ever heard. Total garbage... anyone who says that in 10,000 years such and such will happen is a moron... unless of course your a geologist or an astronomer or something. Last I heard scientific consensus was that evolution among humans has mostly stalled.
izeasgtOct 18, 2006
1000 years? Within 50 years, we'll probably have this.<a class="user" href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0405.html">http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0405.html</a>
zenmojoOct 18, 2006
Eh, calf implants for legs.As for height, that is pretty much how height works. It's usually the average of your parents' height plus two or more inches...on average.And a penis too large really is useless. Seven inches is preferable, otherwise it just pokes the back of the canal. Average vaginal size is 7 inches, average penis size is 5 1/4 inches.
covertbadgerOct 18, 2006
What the f**k are you talking about? The licence fee is nowhere near £180, and to argue that a Murdoch-owned mouthpiece like the Times is anything other than a patisan tabloid in formal dress betrays you as a complete tool. What did you do at the BBC, wash the windows?
javipOct 20, 2006
They could have simplified this...dim-witted underclass = republicans/conservatives
britishyosefOct 25, 2007
It's all guess work anyway, and none of us will be around to see the results.