howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com — This short survey will tell you how many five year old children you could fight at once. Results are based on physical prowess, training, swarm-combatting experience, and the flexibility of your moral compass.
Dec 13, 2007 View in Crawl 4
zetamilkDec 14, 2007
What better way is there to take out a child then to use his own friend as the weapon?
greedonvrfiredMar 26, 2011
A 5 year old is an unwieldy weapon, which is why you should knock out the first arrival, grab his ankle, step on his opposite inner thigh and tear his leg off. That will make a more effective club and you will have let the little bastards know you mean business.
paadamsDec 17, 2007
It says i could take 34, Hell yeah. Bring on the five year olds.
solaradeptDec 19, 2007
23 for now, but I think i can take on more, at least thrice as much.
doreenhDec 21, 2007
got 26 myself personally i feel great about this 26 less kids!
mnmlmnJan 24, 2008
I got 28 and I have shown this site to a lot of people!
alceriaApr 2, 2008
<a class="user" href="http://www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com/">http://www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight ...</a> is clearly giving people a false sense of security.
gardoggMay 1, 2008
These two comments just made my day. PRICELESS!!!
gardoggMay 1, 2008
Can you imagine the outrage though? You though GTA had a negative response!? This would cause turmoil!
gardoggMay 1, 2008
Of course they could always just slide around on their bellies and gnaw at your ankles, hmmm...OMG that is HILARIOUS! ahahah
gardoggMay 1, 2008
Seriously, I'm trying to eat here and comments like this are getting salad all over my monitor!
whatsthatyouJan 21, 2009
31, i guess we are going to need a bigger boat.
elitebmoJan 22, 2009
27 here, but they got me to sign up for that stupid site cause i missed the link. Jesus@yahoo.com is gonna be pretty annoyed getting emails id think.
parallax7dApr 10, 2009
I've come to the conclusion that if done right, you could take on several hundred 5 year olds. It wouldn't be easy, but if you handle yourself correctly, and employ the correct technique you should be able to do this. There are 3 stages.Stage 1 lasts for the first few seconds. You will be standing, so use your legs and maneuverability to trip up and push down as many 5 year olds as you can. Once a 5 year old is on the ground they wont have time to get back up before being pushed or trampled by another 5 year old. Be sure to make a perimeter of fallen children around you. As the mass of children approaches, the fallen children will be trampled, and provide a crucial obstacle to the swarm of children rushing towards you.Stage 2 lasts for perhaps a minute or two. You will be surrounded by children, pulling you down, biting, scratching, grabbing at you to immobilize you. The key here is to keep your arms free, you should still have enough leverage to keep at least one arm free, and gouging every eyeball in sight. You will find that once a 5 year old is gouged, they will fall to the ground creating a physical barrier for the next 5 year old to trip over as they get closer. Gouge enough eyes and you will start making a surprisingly effective obstacle.Stage 3 "King of the Hill" is the longest stage. At this point you are basically balancing/squating/kneeling on a bunch of trampled bodies. Do your best to stay balanced, and on TOP. Your height is your leverage, and leverage is important when fighting on a big bloody mound of bodies. Keep your eyes out of their reach, and you will find that fewer and fewer 5 year olds will be able to reach you at the same time, they will have to climb over numerous bodies to get to you, greatly slowing their attack. By this point you will have plenty of time to focus on staying balanced, heightening your pile, and conserving your energy.
frankystein123Apr 3, 2010
Apparently I can take on thirty kids, that's partly because I choose that I would have no reservations about punching little kids in the face and using them as meat-shields. Hey, when you are trapped, you do what you have to in order to survive right? And besides, kids these days are little bastards anyways.