youtube.com
ae357emJan 26, 2008
To demonstrate the contrast between what life presently is...and what it could be with out the government.
obliviousfoolJan 26, 2008
The anthrax used in the attacks was weaponized to a spore count that has not been achieved outside of the US government. They have a patent on the method for reaching this level of purity. Others have tried and failed. Knowing this, Maureen Stevens - a widow of one of the victims, sued the US for their inadequate security. That is, they were negligent in their storage of this anthrax which was then used to kill her husband.<a class="user" href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/09/24/anthrax.lawsuit/">http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/09/24/anthrax.lawsuit/</a><a class="user" href="http://www.anthraxinvestigation.com/Doc-Stv1.html">http://www.anthraxinvestigation.com/Doc-Stv1.html</a>The case seems to be trudging forward. If there is any change, I'm sure the press will dutifully ignore it.
erosamadeusJan 27, 2008
Is this the same government that could in no way at all be involved in the attacks of 9/11? These guys could never do that: <a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Central_Intelligence_Agency_operations">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Central_Inte ...</a>Right?
Closed AccountJan 27, 2008
Now it is time for someone to have the balls to say the same thing about 9/11 and all other attacks associated with Al Qaeda.
metapopJan 28, 2008
this was shocking. anti-troofers, how will you deny this? how many red flags need to go up before you realize that this administration has been lying to the american public for years? IMPEACH IMMEDIATELY.
No more comments on this story. Add your own!
ae357emJan 26, 2008
To demonstrate the contrast between what life presently is...and what it could be with out the government.
obliviousfoolJan 26, 2008
The anthrax used in the attacks was weaponized to a spore count that has not been achieved outside of the US government. They have a patent on the method for reaching this level of purity. Others have tried and failed. Knowing this, Maureen Stevens - a widow of one of the victims, sued the US for their inadequate security. That is, they were negligent in their storage of this anthrax which was then used to kill her husband.<a class="user" href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/09/24/anthrax.lawsuit/">http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/09/24/anthrax.lawsuit/</a><a class="user" href="http://www.anthraxinvestigation.com/Doc-Stv1.html">http://www.anthraxinvestigation.com/Doc-Stv1.html</a>The case seems to be trudging forward. If there is any change, I'm sure the press will dutifully ignore it.
erosamadeusJan 27, 2008
Is this the same government that could in no way at all be involved in the attacks of 9/11? These guys could never do that: <a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Central_Intelligence_Agency_operations">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Central_Inte ...</a>Right?
Closed AccountJan 27, 2008
Now it is time for someone to have the balls to say the same thing about 9/11 and all other attacks associated with Al Qaeda.
metapopJan 28, 2008
this was shocking. anti-troofers, how will you deny this? how many red flags need to go up before you realize that this administration has been lying to the american public for years? IMPEACH IMMEDIATELY.