thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com — It’s 3 a.m. and that darn phone is ringing again. This time, it’s an economic crisis, not a national security issue.And the person who can’t deal with it is not Barack Obama, who in the prequel was unable to deal with the security issue, but John McCain.Yes, it’s the new ad from Senator Hillary Clinton.
Apr 2, 2008 View in Crawl 4
childeroland420Apr 3, 2008
Unfettered free market capitalism hasn't existed in the USA for decades.
syd2007Apr 3, 2008
It's at last a good thing that she now attacks McCain instead of Obama.What should have been done, is that the superdelegates should have joined and written a letter to both the Clinton and Obama campaign stating that from now on negative campaigning towards the other candidate would not be tolerated, and that this would lead to that the candidate responsible for the attack would lose their votes to the one being attacked.In this way the democratic nomination process could've just dragged on until the convention. That would've probably just helped the democrats, as it would lead to more media coverage of the democratic candidates, at the same time as both of the democratic candidates would have pointed their attacks towards the republicans.
schmapdiApr 3, 2008
Yes, I'm not one of those "drop out now" people - but at least stop praising the republican and smearing your own party.
Closed AccountApr 3, 2008
Both Clinton and Obama are weak on civil rights<a class="user" href="http://digg.com/world_news/Australia_s_1996_Gun_Ban_Did_it_Work">http://digg.com/world_news/Australia_s_1996_Gun_Ba ...</a>
pherdnutApr 4, 2008
She could be in the Cayman Islands even.
blaircowanukApr 4, 2008
So i guess casual sexism is out of the question. Dont worry, im a clever chap really, im not voting for her not because she is a woman, but because she is disconnected to the point of autism!
Closed AccountApr 5, 2008
Someone's on the rag.