unionleader.com — A New Hampshire newspaper tears into Hillary Clinton for breaking her pledge not to campaign in Florida: "Sen. Hillary Clinton signed a pledge not to "campaign or participate" in the Michigan or Florida Democratic primaries. She participated in both primaries and is campaigning in Florida. Which proves, again, that Hillary Clinton is a liar."
Jan 29, 2008 View in Crawl 4
voyvfJan 30, 2008
Because whether they're Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, people tend to gravitate toward herd mentality. It's incredibly stupid, and one would think that in this day and age the masses would have grown beyond that by now. But then again, one would also think that America wouldn't have been so moronic as to vote Bush into office two terms in a row.
elliotysJan 30, 2008
Im not sure how her trying to cover up her husbands activities, which was none of our business in the first place, makes her untrustworthy. Sex is the one thing both sexes, no matter how honest, lie about.
atvnut719Jan 30, 2008
You know i would try to talk about how many biased liberal nutjobs visit this site each and everyday but considering as soon as something is said that doesnt endorse obama or a clinton it gets burried.....so GO OBAMA 08 ! do i get my diggs now?
bilabrinJan 31, 2008
I see the effect of the new Digg algorythm- out with Paul, in with Obama it would seem. Probably a calculated move with potential Digg buyers in mind....
digitalarcanumJan 31, 2008
gentleman, you're acting like politicians that do nothing are a bad thing. I'd rather have a politician do nothing than be a complete f**k-up when he does anything (see: our president)
dunamis99Feb 3, 2008
The fact is the rules are the rules. The practical reason that you do not have any states other than Iowa, New Hampshire and now Nevada and South Carolina...are they are small states that are easier to campaign in and buy media time in. The field can be winnowed down and the process is more efficient. That is the reason. It isn't like the GOP and the DNC changed the rules after the game started....the GOP stripped them of half...the DNC said they were going to take them all if they moved it before Feb....because they didn't play by the rules and they did what they wanted to do...they don't get a say. What MI and FL voters should do is kickout the idiots that let it happen.I am not a prophet...but I am going to predict something...I promise you that Bill and Hillary are going to cry and complain and talk about how "disenfranchised" the voters are...and how wrong it is that MI and FL didn't get a say...then bring up how the election was stolen from Gore, etc. etc., etc.I supported Gore...but he was STUPID to ask for a recount in certain counties and not statewide. THAT is why he lost...you can't change the rules after the fact.The fact is if you join an organization...and they have rules you eithe r follow them or leave and do your own thing. It won't matter to Billary..because they have to win at all costs....and if they lie or twist the truth or take advantage of someone's ignorance....that is what they do.
bigballistixFeb 18, 2008
How the hell did I do that?
pedromatosMar 11, 2008
Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a significant issue about how the press is treating Hillary unfairly in their hyper-critical reporting on her and their “softball” reporting on Barak Obama. Hillary maintains she has been fully investigated by the media and Barak hasn’t!As the Tony Rezko trial begins in Chicago, Clinton and her surrogates are linking Obama to Rezko and the media is speculating about whether Obama will be called to testify as a witness in the case. Obama has always admitted he received $85,000 in contributions from Rezko which Obama has now donated to charity rather than keep.Yet the civil fraud trial of Bill Clinton for defrauduing Hillary’s largest donor in 2000 into giving her campaign more than $1.2 million, pending in Los Angeles courts since 2003, is now preparing for a November, 2008 trial. The discovery that is now proceeding after a February 21 hearing, and the pending trial, have NEVER been announced by the mainstream media.Hillary was able to extricate herself as a co-defendant in the case in January, 2008 after years of appeals to be protected by the First Amendment from tort claims arising out of federal campaign solicitations she made. Her abuse of the intent of California’s anti-SLAPP law after the California Supreme Court refused to dismiss her from the case in 2004 is emblematic of her contempt for the Rule of Law.Hillary will be called as a witness in both discovery and the trial according to the trial court Judge who so-advised Hillary’s attorney David Kendall when he dismissed Hillary as a co-defendant in 2007. A subpoena is being prepared this month and will be served personally on Hillary, along with Chelsea, Pa Gov. Ed Rendell, Al Gore and other well known political and media figures.Yet the media has refused to report about this landmark civil fraud case- brought by Hillary’s biggest 2000 donor to her Senate race, regarding allegations that were corroborated by the Department of Justice in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May, 2005. That indictment and trial was credited as resulting from the civil suit’s allegations by Peter Paul, the Hollywood dot com millionaire Bill Clinton convinced to donate more than $1.2 million (according to the DOJ prosecutors and the FBI) to Hillary’s Senate campaign as part of a post White House business deal with Bill.The media - except for World Net Daily- has also suspiciously refused to report on Hillary’s last FEC report regarding her 2000 Senate campaign, filed in January 30, 2006. In a secret settlement of an FEC complaint by the plaintiff in Paul v Clinton, Peter Paul, the FEC fined Hillary’s campaign $35,000 for hiding more than $720,000 in donations from Paul, and it required Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended FEC report.In that report Hillary and her campaign again hid Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign and falsely attributed $250,000 as being donated by Paul’s partner, Spider Man creator Stan Lee, who swore in a video taped deposition he never gave Hillary or her campaign any money.Lee did testify to trading $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he gave $100,000 to Hillary’s campaign (admission of a felony) but none of that has been reported by the “overly critical” media!Where is the outrage from Obama that the press is engaging in a double standard relating to his possible role in the Rezko trial and his refunding the $85,000 contributed to his campaign by Rezko- which Obama has always admitted taking. The media makes no mention of Hillary’s role as a witness in Bill’s fraud trial for defrauding Hillary’s largest donor- and Hillary’s refusal to refund the $1.2 million she illegally received from Paul, which she has denied taking from Paul ever since the Washington Post asked her about Paul and his felony convictions from the 1970’s before her first Senate election in 2000?visit hillcap.org