appleinsider.com — The guys over at AppleInsider have posted a few dozen quality photos of a green 4GB second generation iPod nano unpacking. Each new nano ships in packaging made of translucent hard plastic, which showcases the nano in the front and hides the accessories in a small white box behind the iPod.
Sep 13, 2006 View in Crawl 4
alecksSep 13, 2006
maybe they didn't have a tripod
reynaldo77Sep 13, 2006
I personally love the sound quality of the Apple Earbuds, they're the best I've heard that cost less than the iPod itself. They are a bit big for my ears though and start to get uncomfortable after a few hours.And it does include a charger... the USB cable. You have a computer to plug it into, right?
moderngeekSep 13, 2006
Who can afford a $2000 macro lens, but not a $20 tripod? I agree, these photos suck.
circlefusionSep 13, 2006
"If you don't like it, don't buy it."Ya know, if that theory were applied to everything that we discuss here on digg, then what would we talk about? Only things that we are willing to buy?Where else can that logic go ...Maybe if you don't like the comment, don't read it?I don't agree.
quashSep 13, 2006
Is this the Apple product with the Sigmatel STMP chip? If so, it can do gapless, 5 second crossfade, has a 5-band parametric EQ, can do on-the-fly playlists and re-ordering, appending, removing of songs, and can play Ogg. But, look for Apple to disable all these features, even though the chip comes with them enabled.
shortcircuit13Sep 14, 2006
Errrrr, you do know that you can put "normal" MP3's on your iPod, right?Or, are you just one of those people who are blindly and moronically against what you think is the big bad establishment run by capitalist money-grubbing pigs intent on sucking the money out of poor wittle consumers by, OMG, better advertising and industrial design?*sigh*
hikerSep 14, 2006
If you're not prepared to familiarise yourself with a product even a LITTLE bit, how can you possibly comment on it? Nobody's asking you to disassemble an ipod or anything.
jediorangeSep 14, 2006
It's not photoshopping, it's just a wide open aperture. As you close your aperture, it widens your depth of field.
felchdonkeySep 14, 2006
Obviously Apple has decided that packaging a CD just so you could have iTunes on the disc (which you'd probably have to update with a download anyway) was a waste of money for them.I'm not defending that reasoning, but on the other hand, if this nano sells as well as the last, that's about 10 million less CDs that are going to end up in landfills. The motive might be cheap greed on Apple's part, but if the effect is 10 million less CDs that have to be manufactured and discarded, it's a good thing.