washingtontimes.com— The 2,074-page Senate health care bill would take 34 hours to read cover to cover -- and that's just what Sen. Tom Coburn wants done on the Senate floor.
Nov 19, 2009View in Crawl 4
Why? You want to hear more Republican "death panels" or bringing out their kids for some nonsense? The real debates are done behind closed doors and are already finished.Just pass the thing and let's move. If there's any problem, do like the stimulus bill and just fix it later.
So finding a way to circumvent the spirit of the Constitution by playing games with it's wording?You're either a troll of utmost skill or an idiot of unprecedented magnitude.
I consider the bill of rights well written and agree with its precepts, but even that document has been open to misinterpretation by our fine politicians and activist judges.For example, what part of "the right of the People to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" is so hard to comprehend?And why do people mistake the freedom OF religion as the freedom FROM religion?
beratebirthersNov 20, 2009
Really? What has so done to deserve that? She managed to get the bill passed, didn't see?
beratebirthersNov 20, 2009
Why? You want to hear more Republican "death panels" or bringing out their kids for some nonsense? The real debates are done behind closed doors and are already finished.Just pass the thing and let's move. If there's any problem, do like the stimulus bill and just fix it later.
Closed AccountNov 20, 2009
Dude, you're a f**king idiot. DIAF.
drmangrumNov 20, 2009
So finding a way to circumvent the spirit of the Constitution by playing games with it's wording?You're either a troll of utmost skill or an idiot of unprecedented magnitude.
hetmanNov 20, 2009
Sweet read it. DvR it and you are good to go. You do not even have to stay up 34 hours striaght.
Closed AccountNov 20, 2009Submitter
I consider the bill of rights well written and agree with its precepts, but even that document has been open to misinterpretation by our fine politicians and activist judges.For example, what part of "the right of the People to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" is so hard to comprehend?And why do people mistake the freedom OF religion as the freedom FROM religion?