scamstocks.com— With recent reports of hackers crawling through the innards of the iPhone markets are aghast at the prospect of what this means. So, what does it mean?It means that Apple wins and at&t loses.
Jul 9, 2007View in Crawl 4
It DOES apply. All that needs to happen is somebody needs to hack the iPhone into accepting another company's SIM card, then switch the SIMs. Updates to the iPhone would be ignored; they can't update it without your permission.
Yes you should have FINAL say about which extra applications are installed on your phone/computer/etc. But you shouldn't necessarily have total control.For e.g. If you worked for the cell phone company would you like someone using an application that downloads a webpage/new email every minute? What about having a customer who spreads a virus on the network (from their cellphone) because they had total control over the applications on the phone.Almost no company has properly balanced security and access in software. (Its hard, and if you give people less access then some will be forced to buy your ringtones/music/wall papers instead of putting their own free ones on.)
It's not in Apple's interest to break their balls trying to make it as hard as possible to get the phone to work with other carriers. They just need to pretend to make an effort.
Yeah, go ahead and digg me down, you Apple fanboys. iPhone's a piece of junk.........I will be getting the $300 Linux phone which can work on any carrier, and CAN copy and paste. People who buy iPhone are Democrats who dont support Bush and think we're not fighting Al-Qaeda in the Iraq war
Nice stock tip.... You can't look at stock prices equally valued. It doesn't matter that Apple "costs" 3 times as much as AT&T, and you can't factor that into the recommendation. He doesn't take into account growth, expense ratio, # of shares, etc... It's like saying you can buy 15-20 shares of Yahoo for 1 share of Google, so why buy Google?
cankillarJul 10, 2007
It DOES apply. All that needs to happen is somebody needs to hack the iPhone into accepting another company's SIM card, then switch the SIMs. Updates to the iPhone would be ignored; they can't update it without your permission.
goodlysheepJul 10, 2007
Who the f**k pays 500-600 USD for a phone. Financial sanity anyone?
dotcommerJul 10, 2007
EDGE will be the eventual death of the iPhone.
electrobotJul 10, 2007
Yes you should have FINAL say about which extra applications are installed on your phone/computer/etc. But you shouldn't necessarily have total control.For e.g. If you worked for the cell phone company would you like someone using an application that downloads a webpage/new email every minute? What about having a customer who spreads a virus on the network (from their cellphone) because they had total control over the applications on the phone.Almost no company has properly balanced security and access in software. (Its hard, and if you give people less access then some will be forced to buy your ringtones/music/wall papers instead of putting their own free ones on.)
bobbyiJul 10, 2007
It's not in Apple's interest to break their balls trying to make it as hard as possible to get the phone to work with other carriers. They just need to pretend to make an effort.
Closed AccountJul 10, 2007
Yeah, go ahead and digg me down, you Apple fanboys. iPhone's a piece of junk.........I will be getting the $300 Linux phone which can work on any carrier, and CAN copy and paste. People who buy iPhone are Democrats who dont support Bush and think we're not fighting Al-Qaeda in the Iraq war
xemus83Jul 10, 2007
Nice stock tip.... You can't look at stock prices equally valued. It doesn't matter that Apple "costs" 3 times as much as AT&T, and you can't factor that into the recommendation. He doesn't take into account growth, expense ratio, # of shares, etc... It's like saying you can buy 15-20 shares of Yahoo for 1 share of Google, so why buy Google?
rethcirJul 10, 2007
What a non-article.
answer42Jul 10, 2007
WOOSH. That's the sound of sarcasm going over your head.