video.google.com— Jim Tucker exposes new information from a mole attending the recent trilateral commission meeting, about the plot to pressure Ron Paul to drop out and stop his fiscal and foreign policy wake up tour
May 8, 2008View in Crawl 4
Ron Paul is a 'by the book' neoclassical economist. If you want to know why his policies are dangerous just go on a bit of a search.The market is not always right.
everybody, please take a look at Herkimer56's profile history, especially the number of comments vs. diggs as well as his dork-inspired avatar (which was previously a CIA emblem - not kidding) so you can get a good look at how neo-brownshirts hijack democracy using exploitation, lies, fraud, and deception. No need to respond to him, 'nuff said.
hey ssn, get a job, and stop drinking so much. or stop drinking, then get a job. If commenting on digg was your M.O. or civilian job and if I was your C.O. or supervisor, I would fire you for somehow driving people TOWARD Ron Paul. your numerous and ineffective comments result in NEGATIVE productivity. by any measure of economics, your failure rate is astounding! In fact, I'm torn between wasting my time making this comment to you or spending my time actually contributing to the greater good of society by doing something productive, but it just feels so damn UNAMERICAN to let your authoritarian stupidity sit on this page unanswered and unconfirmed.
JDenigma, thank you for an actual intelligent post from the Ron Paul Camp. I dugg that up.Now, I'm not sure if any of the other responders frequent the Ron Paul threads and complain about him there, but I can say that this was my first anti-Paul post. As for your point that the anti-Paul supporters are beating a dead horse; that same logic could be applied to this new wave of pro-Paul stories making it to the front page. Paul is a dead and done candidate, and just like the supporters still promote him, the detractors will still rail on him.The thing with "skeletons in the closet" when it comes to politics, is that the public generally doesn't care that it happened 10-15 years ago. They learned that information today, and it is affecting how they think now. I agree that it's stupid, but it's how the general population thinks. If turned out to be true, those racism claims from Pauls closet will be fresh in the minds of the voters, and that is all that matters.(incase your wondering why my response is so far away, the new comment system wouldn't allow me to post in the same thread)
risingashesMay 9, 2008
Ron Paul is a 'by the book' neoclassical economist. If you want to know why his policies are dangerous just go on a bit of a search.The market is not always right.
hortnonMay 9, 2008
Congratulations.
digitalhairMay 10, 2008
everybody, please take a look at Herkimer56's profile history, especially the number of comments vs. diggs as well as his dork-inspired avatar (which was previously a CIA emblem - not kidding) so you can get a good look at how neo-brownshirts hijack democracy using exploitation, lies, fraud, and deception. No need to respond to him, 'nuff said.
digitalhairMay 11, 2008
hey ssn, get a job, and stop drinking so much. or stop drinking, then get a job. If commenting on digg was your M.O. or civilian job and if I was your C.O. or supervisor, I would fire you for somehow driving people TOWARD Ron Paul. your numerous and ineffective comments result in NEGATIVE productivity. by any measure of economics, your failure rate is astounding! In fact, I'm torn between wasting my time making this comment to you or spending my time actually contributing to the greater good of society by doing something productive, but it just feels so damn UNAMERICAN to let your authoritarian stupidity sit on this page unanswered and unconfirmed.
kent4jmjMay 13, 2008
anyone else noticed the level of "discourse" coming from the Paul HATERS seems to have, somehow, unimaginably, dropped even lower than before?
metroidragonMay 15, 2008
JDenigma, thank you for an actual intelligent post from the Ron Paul Camp. I dugg that up.Now, I'm not sure if any of the other responders frequent the Ron Paul threads and complain about him there, but I can say that this was my first anti-Paul post. As for your point that the anti-Paul supporters are beating a dead horse; that same logic could be applied to this new wave of pro-Paul stories making it to the front page. Paul is a dead and done candidate, and just like the supporters still promote him, the detractors will still rail on him.The thing with "skeletons in the closet" when it comes to politics, is that the public generally doesn't care that it happened 10-15 years ago. They learned that information today, and it is affecting how they think now. I agree that it's stupid, but it's how the general population thinks. If turned out to be true, those racism claims from Pauls closet will be fresh in the minds of the voters, and that is all that matters.(incase your wondering why my response is so far away, the new comment system wouldn't allow me to post in the same thread)