legatissimo.info — Some reporter didn't want to be bothered with earning their paycheck, so they lifted material from the Timothy Leary Wikipedia page . It was shoddy journalism for a reporter to include unverified information in what is supposed to be a credible news source. What is shoddier is that the Wikipedia information is from GULLIBLE.info.
Jul 27, 2006 View in Crawl 4
mxclJul 27, 2006
I had all but given up on British newspapers, until I discovered the Guardian. I thought I'd found balanced and neutral reporting. But after I'd read a few articles on technical stuff that I'm quite knowledgable about, I realised that the journalists at the Guardian don't know what they're talking about.Nowadays I stick to the blogosphere, basically. The information is probably inaccurate, but most of the time at least the author admits to his level of know-how, so you can judge the accuracy of the reporting.The comments are usually revealing and I can click links to get more factoids.
ellisglJul 27, 2006
It's amazing how many articles are posted as fact that came from satire sites. Oh well - make up your own crap.
mercuryxxcloudsJul 27, 2006
I never checked out the Guardian, but sounds like they need to sort themselves out first....I'd rather get my false info from uncyclopedia.org, at least I can have a laugh.