Submitted by
Users who Dugg This
Phil Perspective
9370 Followers
liberalsockpuppet
-9 Followers
Shihtzuman
271 Followers
Comgen & Dr. Socks' love child
12557 Followers
Thomas Mifflin
1245 Followers
murrdpirateFeb 7, 2010
Actually, yes you can go from 800,000 jobs lost from one month to gains in the next, especially if the government is spending a ton of money.But yes, the fact that unemployment is still going up with Obama in office doesn't prove he's doing a bad job. But the fact that the rate of unemployment is going down doesn't prove he is doing a good job. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
rentalcanoeFeb 8, 2010
Presidents sign the bills into LAW.
msukateFeb 10, 2010
I love me a good infographic.
zacharytelschowFeb 12, 2010
Any fiscal conservative saw the stimulus as something that would temporarily improve the economy but cause long term damage. With unemployment at 10%, the short term hasn't been that great. How do you think the debt repayment on a trillion dollars will help an already weak economy?
jeffbwFeb 18, 2010
Would you loons kindly move to another country so you don't f**k mine up again? PLEASE try your "theories" somewhere else.
stonersoupMar 1, 2010
You have to go by the percentage of unemployement. "Period. Nice try!
stonersoupMar 1, 2010
Ok but now the dem's control congress and senate and we have a dem pres. "Can we still blame Bush?
bbmike15Mar 5, 2010
might as well be
caine22Mar 21, 2010
it took bush 8 years to break the economy? or you must mean that he only decided to break it in the last year her was in office? because the economy was fantastic for a large portion of his presidency. unless these things are somewhat cyclical.... whoa... not to say that presidents have no impact on the economy, but im pretty sure bush didn't make the housing bubble happen/burst.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.