newsminer.com — Recent studies by the Hadley Climate Research Center (UK), the Japan Meteorological Agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the University of East Anglia (UK) and the University of Alabama Huntsville show clearly that the rising trend of global average temperature stopped in 2000-2001.
Sep 29, 2008 View in Crawl 4
greenfyreSep 29, 2008
Really? then why does the Hadly Centre say "Climate sceptics have their head in the sand" <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/environment/Climate_sceptics_have_their_head_in_the_sand_The_Met_Office?">http://digg.com/environment/Climate_sceptics_have_ ...</a>Could it be because the whole global cooling claim is a Denier Myth? <a class="user" href="http://debunking.pbwiki.com/Global-Cooling-Myth">http://debunking.pbwiki.com/Global-Cooling-Myth</a> ...Definitely!"Unfortunately, many scientists appear to forget that weather and climate also are controlled by nature"Unfortunately many wingnuts appear to forget that they are clueless twits who's long winded, fact free polemics regurgitating debunked Denier Myths <a class="user" href="http://debunking.pbwiki.com/Denier-Myths-Debunked">http://debunking.pbwiki.com/Denier-Myths-Debunked</a> without addressing the science <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/environment/Natural_and_Anthropogenic_Climate_Change">http://digg.com/environment/Natural_and_Anthropoge ...</a> in a rational manner are a waste of bytes.Regardless of the alleged credential of the author this is nothing more than an opinion piece that completely fails to address the facts.
grbradskSep 29, 2008
Just a masking trend from our current place in the solar cycle. This is a sucker's bet: "Bet warming goes down in the next couple of years ... because we're on the downside of the ~11 year solar cycle, when we're on the upside, warming will appear to accelerate -- warming proceeds apace. Also note that when dynamic systems shift modes the shifting time appears more stable. Like a ball thrown in the air will slow to a stop ... but that's only half the story.
greenfyreSep 30, 2008
BMoCDo you just like to hear yourself talk or what? Are you being deliberately misleading or do actually not get it?Quite obviously in the 1st article the blue lines are there to illustrate how bogus and meaningless it is to take 10 yr trends. So you find the partial answer to your first point in both of the 1st links, that climate is assessed by 30 yr increments. Naturally this IS discussed in lots of places, it's just no one thought to send a hand written explanation to your home. Ever heard of a search engine? Just search for ' climate "why 30 year" ' as a start; that way you know I am not prejudicing the answers.Here, I'll do it for you <a class="user" href="http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&safe=off&rlz=1B3GGGL_enCA274CA281&q=climate+%22why+30+year%22&btnG=Search&meta=">http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&safe=off&rlz=1B3 ...</a>But then this is what you always do in your comments, be deliberately obtuse. You're clearly smart enough of concoct these "objections", so you're probably smart enough to do the 5 min of work to get the answers. How about you try that from now on?
greenfyreSep 30, 2008
geologist? geologist? and you propagate that bogus myth <a class="user" href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/12/17/223957/72">http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/12/17/223957 ...</a>Not to mention showing no understanding whatsoever of climatic history? <a class="user" href="http://debunking.pbwiki.com/Historic-climate-change-in-context">http://debunking.pbwiki.com/Historic-climate-chang ...</a> <a class="user" href="http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics#Stages%20of%20Denial">http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics#Stages%20of%20 ...</a> as for humans, try some science <a class="user" href="http://debunking.pbwiki.com/Humans+Causing+Climate+Change">http://debunking.pbwiki.com/Humans+Causing+Climate ...</a>