telegraph.co.uk— Global warming is caused by radiation from the sun, according to a leading scientist speaking out at an alternative skeptics conference in Copenhagen.
Dec 8, 2009View in Crawl 4
I'm going to go out on a crazzzzzzzzy limb here and say that more than one factor has an impact on the earths temperature. This might sound like an Alex Jones conspiracy, but bare with me, perhaps both changes in solar radiation AND infrared absorbing properties from gases in our atmosphere can influences the Earth's temperature. Logically it does seem like it must be one OR the other.....but perhaps commentators on digg can suspend logic just this once.
The video you linked to has no science and attempt to explain geophysical phenomena in terms of politics. That makes the 99% figure that you pulled out of the air easier to understand.
Rises and falls that occurred over the course of tens of millions of years. As opposed to the current rise, which is occurring over the course of a century.
No sir, you have yet to respond to, or refute a single point I have made. With regard to your link...I am at a stand; Precisly how does a link to a political blog relate to the misrepresentation, distruction of data or the failure to use the most basic of Scientific Methods, documentation, standards and practices by Mann, Jones, Hanson et.al. in any miterial way? The link you posted offered no response whatever. For surely you would agree that for a response to be offered, some relevance to the subject must attach and and the question at issue addressed; and this you have consistantly failed to do.
The experiments you reference have all been performed within a closed enviorment with a very limited set of variables. This is not true of our atmosphere, a maddingly complex problem for which we have a less that perfect understanding. The degree, direction and magnitude of feebacks is not known, and to date no one that is credible will, or can say with any degree or certainty what the net effect the small portion of Co2 added by human activity is. Simply put sir, the answer is at present un-quantifiable...we do not know.
You make claims of knowledge to bolster your blatherings and refute all others by claiming that there is no knowledge - you are a jerk - don't waste people's time with your idiocy
The insurmountable wave of ignorance in all of these post is overwhelming to an educated, logical, and scientific mind. Its s**t like this, all of your ignorant blatherings that make the elite want to exterminate you because you are so ignorant you are ruining the planet for them and for anyone else that cares about the continuence of our speices, or a decent standard of living for anyone. I can bearly function in a society with all these morons(the old pyschiatric use of the word) in it you can't hold an intelligent conversation with most people you meet. Its lunacy I'm beginning to think I'm going insane because of the fact that I can't relate to anyone because no one seems to even be on the same plain of thought as I am. The only thing anyone knows anymore is sports, weather, and celebrities. No one knows anything about anything anymore and most preffer this. Here are some direct quotes from some of my aquantances, "I try not to think" "I just don't want to think" "I never think or try to avoid it". Is being the only sane person in an insane culture make you the insane one?
Love that sarcasm. I think your point is well supported.Global Warming is a trademark of those who would wish to impose a 'carbon tax' on the people while exchanging lucrative contracts on the Carbon Market. It was once said that he who controls water has the greatest power. Not anymore - now it is carbon.I smell major Rockola going on here. A new tax that many will pay to ease their consciences - and all of us will pay by force.The sun is the father of global change on this planet - not man. However, man is the father of avarice.
A nice post that has one wonder as to what would the general populous’ reaction be to the prospect of a quick yet natural onset of an impending ice age. This is not a thought born of someone being a climate change denier, yet to simply wonder what the consensus would be in regards to the inevitable consequence of such changes; that if we had the power to mitigate them would we be so inclined . My thoughts being in as the repercussions being imilar or even worse in respect to all life forms, not simply our own, it would be in contradiction for those that press for action currently not to want to.<a class="user" href="http://www.omnibet.ro/biletul-zilei-pariuri-fotbal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.omnibet.ro/biletul-zilei-pariuri-fotbal ...</a>
gardimusDec 9, 2009
I'm going to go out on a crazzzzzzzzy limb here and say that more than one factor has an impact on the earths temperature. This might sound like an Alex Jones conspiracy, but bare with me, perhaps both changes in solar radiation AND infrared absorbing properties from gases in our atmosphere can influences the Earth's temperature. Logically it does seem like it must be one OR the other.....but perhaps commentators on digg can suspend logic just this once.
m0lluskDec 9, 2009
The video you linked to has no science and attempt to explain geophysical phenomena in terms of politics. That makes the 99% figure that you pulled out of the air easier to understand.
Jordan117Dec 10, 2009
Rises and falls that occurred over the course of tens of millions of years. As opposed to the current rise, which is occurring over the course of a century.
ninjaofpatienceDec 10, 2009
<a class="user" href="http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/SOLAR/IRRADIANCE/irrad.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/SOLAR/IRRADIANCE/irra ...</a>Point out where on the readings the increase in deviance is matched by solar output.
droptop911Dec 11, 2009
No sir, you have yet to respond to, or refute a single point I have made. With regard to your link...I am at a stand; Precisly how does a link to a political blog relate to the misrepresentation, distruction of data or the failure to use the most basic of Scientific Methods, documentation, standards and practices by Mann, Jones, Hanson et.al. in any miterial way? The link you posted offered no response whatever. For surely you would agree that for a response to be offered, some relevance to the subject must attach and and the question at issue addressed; and this you have consistantly failed to do.
droptop911Dec 11, 2009
The experiments you reference have all been performed within a closed enviorment with a very limited set of variables. This is not true of our atmosphere, a maddingly complex problem for which we have a less that perfect understanding. The degree, direction and magnitude of feebacks is not known, and to date no one that is credible will, or can say with any degree or certainty what the net effect the small portion of Co2 added by human activity is. Simply put sir, the answer is at present un-quantifiable...we do not know.
carpentr2Dec 12, 2009
You make claims of knowledge to bolster your blatherings and refute all others by claiming that there is no knowledge - you are a jerk - don't waste people's time with your idiocy
ananarchymanDec 13, 2009
The insurmountable wave of ignorance in all of these post is overwhelming to an educated, logical, and scientific mind. Its s**t like this, all of your ignorant blatherings that make the elite want to exterminate you because you are so ignorant you are ruining the planet for them and for anyone else that cares about the continuence of our speices, or a decent standard of living for anyone. I can bearly function in a society with all these morons(the old pyschiatric use of the word) in it you can't hold an intelligent conversation with most people you meet. Its lunacy I'm beginning to think I'm going insane because of the fact that I can't relate to anyone because no one seems to even be on the same plain of thought as I am. The only thing anyone knows anymore is sports, weather, and celebrities. No one knows anything about anything anymore and most preffer this. Here are some direct quotes from some of my aquantances, "I try not to think" "I just don't want to think" "I never think or try to avoid it". Is being the only sane person in an insane culture make you the insane one?
valisDec 22, 2009
Love that sarcasm. I think your point is well supported.Global Warming is a trademark of those who would wish to impose a 'carbon tax' on the people while exchanging lucrative contracts on the Carbon Market. It was once said that he who controls water has the greatest power. Not anymore - now it is carbon.I smell major Rockola going on here. A new tax that many will pay to ease their consciences - and all of us will pay by force.The sun is the father of global change on this planet - not man. However, man is the father of avarice.
omnibetFeb 2, 2010
A nice post that has one wonder as to what would the general populous’ reaction be to the prospect of a quick yet natural onset of an impending ice age. This is not a thought born of someone being a climate change denier, yet to simply wonder what the consensus would be in regards to the inevitable consequence of such changes; that if we had the power to mitigate them would we be so inclined . My thoughts being in as the repercussions being imilar or even worse in respect to all life forms, not simply our own, it would be in contradiction for those that press for action currently not to want to.<a class="user" href="http://www.omnibet.ro/biletul-zilei-pariuri-fotbal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.omnibet.ro/biletul-zilei-pariuri-fotbal ...</a>