thrfeed.com— A hilariously awkward moment in CBS News' Katie Couric's interview with Fox News' Glenn Beck where she gently, insistently kept asking Beck to explain exactly what he meant by "white culture"
Sep 26, 2009View in Crawl 4
I could count the number of American politicians and commentators that could hold up in a typical English interview on one hand. It's a totally different environment. They would simply be ravaged by logic. We have no tolerance for their type of pathetic excuse for 'discourse'. Paxman interviewing Anne Coulter:<a class="user" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aiHbUplz3k" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aiHbUplz3k</a>
Since we're in a time of war, I think we should just trust our PresidentCan't argue with that without contradicting yourself from six years ago, can you, you idiot?
People are doing this because this is one of Beck's tactics - he uses unfounded allegations and tries to get people to prove unprovable things. It's not just the "prove you weren't born in kenya" and "prove you're not a secret muslim". Take this for example:<a class="user" href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200611150004" rel="nofollow">http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200611150004</a>CNN's Beck to first-ever Muslim congressman: "I have been nervous about this interview with you, because what I feel like saying is, 'Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies.' " Beck added: "I'm not accusing you of being an enemy, but that's the way I feel, and I think a lot of Americans will feel that way."We're not being immature; we're just using this douchebag's tactics on himself. And until he comes forward with the proof that he did not rape that girl in 1990 (I don't believe it to be true, but people are talking about it), I will wonder why he's spent millions of dollars to squash the allegations. Fox needs to air both sides of this controversy.
No reason he cannot be both. I cannot see why lunatics would not identify themselves with any major groups at all.Conservative is a meaningless term these days. More brand than description. Lunatics do seem to fixate on particular individuals or causes as friends or foes, however. I have noticed that much from reading/watching real news stories over the years.Hard to believe this man was hired as a News commentator.
i dont think this shows he's a racist... he's just an idiot. he likes hearing himself talk. he doesnt think before he speaks and just puts emphasis in his voice to make it sound meaningful.
kitsuaSep 27, 2009
I could count the number of American politicians and commentators that could hold up in a typical English interview on one hand. It's a totally different environment. They would simply be ravaged by logic. We have no tolerance for their type of pathetic excuse for 'discourse'. Paxman interviewing Anne Coulter:<a class="user" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aiHbUplz3k" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aiHbUplz3k</a>
Closed AccountSep 28, 2009
Welcome to Digg.
we11esianOct 1, 2009
Since we're in a time of war, I think we should just trust our PresidentCan't argue with that without contradicting yourself from six years ago, can you, you idiot?
morcheebaOct 4, 2009
People are doing this because this is one of Beck's tactics - he uses unfounded allegations and tries to get people to prove unprovable things. It's not just the "prove you weren't born in kenya" and "prove you're not a secret muslim". Take this for example:<a class="user" href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200611150004" rel="nofollow">http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200611150004</a>CNN's Beck to first-ever Muslim congressman: "I have been nervous about this interview with you, because what I feel like saying is, 'Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies.' " Beck added: "I'm not accusing you of being an enemy, but that's the way I feel, and I think a lot of Americans will feel that way."We're not being immature; we're just using this douchebag's tactics on himself. And until he comes forward with the proof that he did not rape that girl in 1990 (I don't believe it to be true, but people are talking about it), I will wonder why he's spent millions of dollars to squash the allegations. Fox needs to air both sides of this controversy.
spongya77Oct 5, 2009
Libertarians/conservatives make a good job without a nutcase. Because, you know, they are f**king wrong. But Bleck is more entertaining.
johnnysoftwareOct 9, 2009
No reason he cannot be both. I cannot see why lunatics would not identify themselves with any major groups at all.Conservative is a meaningless term these days. More brand than description. Lunatics do seem to fixate on particular individuals or causes as friends or foes, however. I have noticed that much from reading/watching real news stories over the years.Hard to believe this man was hired as a News commentator.
stinkordOct 10, 2009
i dont think this shows he's a racist... he's just an idiot. he likes hearing himself talk. he doesnt think before he speaks and just puts emphasis in his voice to make it sound meaningful.
slimjimzquinnFeb 22, 2010
evasion fail