progressivenation.us— Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) is ramp?ing up his cam?paign to use the Fort Hood shoot?ings to paint the Obama admin?is?tra?tion as soft on terrorism.
Nov 18, 2009View in Crawl 4
What credible source would say Bush caused Katrina? It was the retarded partisans who made that claim, just as retarded partisans are claiming Obama is responsible for Fort Hood.Congress did grant Bush war powers. The Democrats were in the Senate Majority then. Only the partisan hacks like yourself would lie about such recent history.CNN: Senate approves Iraq war resolution<quote>The Senate vote sharply divided Democrats, with 29 voting for the measure and 21 against. All Republicans except Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island voted for passage.Ahead of the vote, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle announced Thursday morning he would support Bush on Iraq, saying it is important for the country "to speak with one voice at this critical moment." <end quote><a class="user" href="http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/11/iraq.us/" rel="nofollow">http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/11/ira ...</a>Ahem... Senate Majority Leader, Democrat Tom DaschleAs far as Obama's back room deal with drug companies...Time Magazine: PhRMA Deal Puts Obama, Congressional Dems at Odds<quote>As reported Thursday, Aug. 6, in the New York Times, the White House agreed privately not to push for anything beyond the $80 billion in savings that the industry promised over the next 10 years. "The President encouraged this approach," deputy chief of staff Jim Messina told the Times. He wanted to bring all the parties to the table to discuss health-insurance reform."That puts the White House on the other side from House Democrats, who are trying to subject the drug industry to the kind of direct price negotiations with Medicare that Emanuel once championed. The White House also agreed, sources say, not to get behind a provision in the House bill that would eliminate a good deal the industry got from another provision in the Medicare prescription-drug program. The law shifted 6 million eligible beneficiaries from Medicaid ? which pays lower prices for drugs ? to the Medicare drug plan. In just the first two years of the program, that shift of beneficiaries from one program to the other produced an estimated $3.7 billion windfall for the industry, according to a report last year by the Democratic staff of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.<end quote><a class="user" href="http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1915139,00.html?iid=digg_share" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1 ...</a>The majority of the real trouble in the financial crisis was a melt down in the derivatives market. Frontline has a very good episode on how the Clinton administration made sure derivatives would not be regulated.<a class="user" href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/warning/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/warning/</a>Why do partisan hacks lie? Well, you should ask yourself that question.
That's funny. My sources are Time Magazine, The New York Times, and PBS and you call that bulls**t you posted credible sources?You're not even a very good partisan hack, are you?
ninaodellNov 18, 2009Submitter
This account has been closed by the user
ddrskataNov 19, 2009
NorthMass, I think I've dugg you up more in the last three days than your entire history on digg.
diefreeNov 19, 2009
Revisionist history much Bull? The Democrats did NOT have majority in the Senate when Bush carried out his illegal invasion, he got the votes by knowingly lying to congress about Iraq.<a class="user" href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/08/during-bush-era-cia-lied-to-congress/" rel="nofollow">http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/08/during-bush ...</a><a class="user" href="http://www.bobharris.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=365&amp;Itemid=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.bobharris.com/index.php?option=com_cont ...</a><a class="user" href="http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20090709_cia_lied_to_congress/" rel="nofollow">http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/200907 ...</a>Yes he Bush's deregulated wall street to the point that got us into the mess.<a class="user" href="http://caveatemptorblog.com/wall-streets-meltdown-deregulation-and-lack-of-consumer-protection/" rel="nofollow">http://caveatemptorblog.com/wall-streets-meltdown- ...</a>Show me one example of a credible source say Bush caused Katrina. You can't. I also want citation Obama cut a "backroom" deal with drug companies.Yes Obama has done things I find disappointing but he was handed a s**t sandwich, so he can't do everything at once especially with the GOP obstructionists. I do agree we need a withdrawal from the wars. Every administration has to have taxes. As far as lobbyists, you mean like the vice president taking money from KBR?
Closed AccountNov 20, 2009
What credible source would say Bush caused Katrina? It was the retarded partisans who made that claim, just as retarded partisans are claiming Obama is responsible for Fort Hood.Congress did grant Bush war powers. The Democrats were in the Senate Majority then. Only the partisan hacks like yourself would lie about such recent history.CNN: Senate approves Iraq war resolution<quote>The Senate vote sharply divided Democrats, with 29 voting for the measure and 21 against. All Republicans except Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island voted for passage.Ahead of the vote, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle announced Thursday morning he would support Bush on Iraq, saying it is important for the country "to speak with one voice at this critical moment." <end quote><a class="user" href="http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/11/iraq.us/" rel="nofollow">http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/11/ira ...</a>Ahem... Senate Majority Leader, Democrat Tom DaschleAs far as Obama's back room deal with drug companies...Time Magazine: PhRMA Deal Puts Obama, Congressional Dems at Odds<quote>As reported Thursday, Aug. 6, in the New York Times, the White House agreed privately not to push for anything beyond the $80 billion in savings that the industry promised over the next 10 years. "The President encouraged this approach," deputy chief of staff Jim Messina told the Times. He wanted to bring all the parties to the table to discuss health-insurance reform."That puts the White House on the other side from House Democrats, who are trying to subject the drug industry to the kind of direct price negotiations with Medicare that Emanuel once championed. The White House also agreed, sources say, not to get behind a provision in the House bill that would eliminate a good deal the industry got from another provision in the Medicare prescription-drug program. The law shifted 6 million eligible beneficiaries from Medicaid ? which pays lower prices for drugs ? to the Medicare drug plan. In just the first two years of the program, that shift of beneficiaries from one program to the other produced an estimated $3.7 billion windfall for the industry, according to a report last year by the Democratic staff of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.<end quote><a class="user" href="http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1915139,00.html?iid=digg_share" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1 ...</a>The majority of the real trouble in the financial crisis was a melt down in the derivatives market. Frontline has a very good episode on how the Clinton administration made sure derivatives would not be regulated.<a class="user" href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/warning/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/warning/</a>Why do partisan hacks lie? Well, you should ask yourself that question.
Closed AccountNov 20, 2009
That's funny. My sources are Time Magazine, The New York Times, and PBS and you call that bulls**t you posted credible sources?You're not even a very good partisan hack, are you?