thinkprogress.org — Former Sen. Bob Graham floated the idea of impeaching Bush in July 2003, arguing that going to war under false pretenses was a better justification than a consensual affair. In a recent interview, he said his impeachment remark ?was a truthful statement at the time and it?s even more truthful today.?
Jun 12, 2007 View in Crawl 4
pamalalaurenJun 13, 2007
Just to say first off Congress had the same information that Clinton had in previous years and they voted the way they voted. But impeachment right now would be a waste of money and time. He's out of office next year, people need to suck it up and deal.
williamdyerJun 13, 2007
3700+ US soldiers600,000+ anonymous brown people who don't go to a Christian churchAn unknown number of mercenariesAnd counting...
waiting2awakeJun 13, 2007
@William Very true.. so what are you against? Against the Dem's because they went with the Repub's? Or are you made at the Democrats because they lied - as did the republicans? Or are you angry because the Democrats pork barrel their politics as do the republicans? See the bottom line is that it doesn't matter who is in power - they are all crooks. However! Right at this moment the crooks in office happen to be republicans, and therefor a lot of the anger is directed at them. Sadly, this only helps create the partisan politics that keep the broken system up and running..
Closed AccountJun 13, 2007
How am I getting digged down? You people are f**king idiots.
peaches19771Jun 13, 2007
there is no doubt in my mind that bush put us in the war that we had because of the 911 case was because he wanted to get back at Saddam for his father so he looked for a reason he could have prevented the war when he was sent a letter saying that it was going to happen but he did not move to protect his people his country bush still needs to learn what it is to be president and maybe go back to school and learn how to run a country and learn a thing or 2 about politics because in my point of view he knows nothing.
whiteravenJun 13, 2007
IF there were false pretenses this would be a completely valid point.There was no false pretense. Bush was up-front with the nation and the world. Legitimate, consistent, logical intelligence indicated that Iraq was a threat. No false information was involved. Even today almost all of the claims made before the war hold water. Iraq's attempt to acquire yellow cake from Niger is a good example. The fact is that yes, it DID happen. The problem is that too much false propaganda *against* the Bush administration has taken hold and is badly misleading the general populace.Bush did not lie. He did not mislead.
datuputiJun 14, 2007
I go for impeachment... at The Hague