blog.flickr.com— If you just want to jump in and start geotagging, open the new 'map' tab in the organizr and go for it. It's all drag and drop and easy to figure out.
Aug 28, 2006View in Crawl 4
Yes, if you upgrade to a Pro account all of your older photos will show up in Organize. All of your titles, descriptions, and tags are saved, you just can't see the older photos while you are non-Pro.
Well, yes, I know I could /pay/ for it. But I'm cheap, you see.You can actually mess with the photos when non-pro. I tagged all my photos with 'Uploaded by Luca' so I can get a full list. They're just not in my Photostream, Organizr, and batch operations. I could probably mess about with the API to do geotagging, but I'd rather not.
Adapt to survive. That is what people always say about commercial businesses who suddenly have to compete with freely-available services from companies such as Google. I don't see how third-party businesses should be an exception to that rule.
purpleaspiAug 28, 2006
@GerryNiger: Thank you, thank you, thank you! (See later post :)
jaredvolklAug 28, 2006
Just tried this out and it's pretty cool. I think it adds a unique element to online image storage.
ocellnuriAug 28, 2006
Yes, if you upgrade to a Pro account all of your older photos will show up in Organize. All of your titles, descriptions, and tags are saved, you just can't see the older photos while you are non-Pro.
lkbmAug 28, 2006
Well, yes, I know I could /pay/ for it. But I'm cheap, you see.You can actually mess with the photos when non-pro. I tagged all my photos with 'Uploaded by Luca' so I can get a full list. They're just not in my Photostream, Organizr, and batch operations. I could probably mess about with the API to do geotagging, but I'd rather not.
bloodwineAug 29, 2006
Adapt to survive. That is what people always say about commercial businesses who suddenly have to compete with freely-available services from companies such as Google. I don't see how third-party businesses should be an exception to that rule.
lancefisherAug 29, 2006
Great! Thanks, it worked. I thought Yahoo just didn't have satellite images for Montana.
velkr0Sep 16, 2006
many thanks!!