engadget.com — It's not much, in fact, these screenshots are incredibly easy to fake. Still, a hastily constructed WordPress blog has been setup to host what are claimed to be the world's first screenshots of Google's new Chrome OS -- hailed as both a Microsoft Windows and Apple OS X killer or Google FUD generator depending upon who you're listening to.
Jul 9, 2009 View in Crawl 4
Closed AccountJul 9, 2009
it's a spray?
mikael110Jul 9, 2009
it is fake. he admitted it himself:<a class="user" href="http://chromeosleak.wordpress.com/">http://chromeosleak.wordpress.com/</a>
polarbeargardenJul 9, 2009
he admits to faking it<a class="user" href="http://chromeosleak.wordpress.com/">http://chromeosleak.wordpress.com/</a>
wdw25Jul 9, 2009
IN THE FACE!!!
gambl0rJul 10, 2009
apparently no one watches the simpsons
geokenJul 15, 2009
"You don't need different SVG images for different sizes"I think you missed my point. By different icons I mean icons that are actually drawn differently. If you look at the folder icons in gnome or windows or osx you'll see that at the smaller sizes it's actually a completely different icon. This has nothing to do with the ability or inability to scale an icon as the source material is in a format that can scale losslessly (whether it was designed in Photoshop, Illustrator or any other app). The reason they do this is because a lot of the finer details of the icon are indescribable at smaller sizes to the point where they actually detract from the clarity of the icon so they are omitted. It's also common from things like drop shadows, lighting effects and perspective angled icons to be removed.
cedricthemasterJul 21, 2009
maybe this is the real deal: <a class="user" href="http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/1778/chromeos1.jpg">http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/1778/chromeos1. ...</a>