arstechnica.com — Version 2 of the browser recently hit Release Candidate 2, but the team is already making plans for 3.0. The Mozilla organization has set up a feature brainstorming web site that allows everyone to enter their favorite wish lists for the open source browser.
Oct 14, 2006 View in Crawl 4
psilanthropistOct 15, 2006
@MaxxIsCool:yeah i heard some of the inbuilt COUGH *security* COUGH features are pretty great too.
i440Oct 15, 2006
“yeah i heard some of the inbuilt COUGH *security* COUGH features are pretty great too.”IE6 or 7 (I don't remember precisely which one) technically has fewer security vulnerabilities then Firefox
madh2oratOct 15, 2006
"IE6 or 7 (I don't remember precisely which one) technically has fewer security vulnerabilities then Firefox"Youre thinking about IE3.1 its pretty secure, then again, it cant do much surfing.
bhalo05Oct 15, 2006
I would like the Linux version to not suck. Until then, I'm sticking with Konqueror.
geminitojanusOct 15, 2006
Work It Harder, Make It BetterDo It Faster, Makes Us StrongerMore Than Ever Hour AfterOur Work Is Never Over.--Mozilla Dev Team.
masamunecyrusOct 15, 2006
@mvent2:We can't file a bug in bugzilla. Do you know why? Because the memory leak problem is a huge problem that was addressed by Mozilla and is officially "it's not a bug, it's a feature." If Mozilla wants to be the best web browser around, they need to stop doing what so many product leaders like Microsoft do and fix the problems, not just ignore them and pretend like they're not there. If Mozilla could be as quick as Opera, it'd be the best browser bar none, but until then, it has things like the memory leak problem, which has been known about for AGES, and they still haven't come up with a solution.
arg553Oct 16, 2006
why would you want that as the default? the type of surfing most people do would leave you with a gazillion tabs open at the end of the session, making the tabs pointless for use in navigation.