xkcd.com — They eventually resolved this self-reference, but Cantor's 'everything-in-the-fetish-book-twice' parties finally sunk the idea. Aug 27, 2008 View in Crawl 4
towlie2110Aug 27, 2008
Even if you understand the joke, it's still not funny.
timmyaAug 27, 2008
Specifically, his incompleteness theorem. Douglas Hofstadter's famous book is a great read for anyone remotely interested in that kind of thing: <a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_Bach">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_B ...</a>edit: I just saw someone above mentioned it, sorry I didn't see. 'Tis a great book, read it!
erichw1504Aug 27, 2008
Let's see how deep this comment will get buried:Garfield > xkcd
Closed AccountAug 27, 2008
Yes, it most certainly is.
eskizoAug 28, 2008
this one didn't make the fp ?
vijethkOct 18, 2008
I never saw this all about?<a class="user" href="http://fresharticles.co.cc/">http://fresharticles.co.cc/</a><a class="user" href="http://inarticles.co.cc/">http://inarticles.co.cc/</a>
No more comments on this story. Add your own!
towlie2110Aug 27, 2008
Even if you understand the joke, it's still not funny.
timmyaAug 27, 2008
Specifically, his incompleteness theorem. Douglas Hofstadter's famous book is a great read for anyone remotely interested in that kind of thing: <a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_Bach">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_B ...</a>edit: I just saw someone above mentioned it, sorry I didn't see. 'Tis a great book, read it!
erichw1504Aug 27, 2008
Let's see how deep this comment will get buried:Garfield > xkcd
Closed AccountAug 27, 2008
Yes, it most certainly is.
eskizoAug 28, 2008
this one didn't make the fp ?
vijethkOct 18, 2008
I never saw this all about?<a class="user" href="http://fresharticles.co.cc/">http://fresharticles.co.cc/</a><a class="user" href="http://inarticles.co.cc/">http://inarticles.co.cc/</a>