nytimes.com— Seventeen Uighurs held at Guant?namo Bay must be freed and allowed into the United States, a federal judge ruled.
Oct 8, 2008View in Crawl 4
What about the poor bastards that got swept up in Bush's disaster and were technically free in 2004, but Bush has held them illegally for 4 years rather than admit his retarded error and let them into America.
They fled their home country(China) because that country has almost as much contempt for their religion as you do. Sending them back would be pretty much a death sentence, which is why decent people know better.
Plain and simple, they are being held and not allowed to leave. They are being denied their freedom. And "not quite provable guilty"? Are you serious?If you cant prove a person is guilty of something, you have NO reason to deny them freedom. This is REGARDLESS of their origin.
Closed AccountOct 8, 2008
What about the poor bastards that got swept up in Bush's disaster and were technically free in 2004, but Bush has held them illegally for 4 years rather than admit his retarded error and let them into America.
publiclurkerOct 9, 2008
They fled their home country(China) because that country has almost as much contempt for their religion as you do. Sending them back would be pretty much a death sentence, which is why decent people know better.
paddyukOct 9, 2008
This.
beernutzOct 9, 2008
Plain and simple, they are being held and not allowed to leave. They are being denied their freedom. And "not quite provable guilty"? Are you serious?If you cant prove a person is guilty of something, you have NO reason to deny them freedom. This is REGARDLESS of their origin.
linuxlarsOct 9, 2008
Dude, at least the US prisoners had the advantage of a trial...
Closed AccountOct 10, 2008
they can stay at your house if you like, hell you can cook them breakfast too, just dont cook bacon
coolhandluke70Oct 25, 2008
Allowed into the U.S.? How about returning them home you f**kers!