jonesreport.com — Bill O'Reilly warned actor Charlie Sheen not to do narration for a theatrical version of Loose Change, threatening "If he voices this, he's through" and stating plainly, "Don't do this. You're not gonna come back from it." In reality, O'Reilly is oh-so desperate to contain 9/11 Truth-- & hush public exposure garnered by Sheen, Rosie O'Donnell etc
Mar 23, 2007 View in Crawl 4
jimi_thingMar 23, 2007
Why do people "waste their time" debunking the 9/11 "truth movement"? Because when people slander the government with such horrendously bad science and no real facts, the decent, logical people are going to step up and show you how you are wrong. And that's what you are. Wrong. That's what the link I posted, and the various other links debunking "Loose Change", such as the Popular Mechanics article, do. They disprove the "facts" in Loose Change as wrong. There is no way around this. If you don't bother to read the debunking sites, which I would guarantee anyone that you don't, then you're just as bad as the people who you claim don't question anything. Why does O'Reilly concerned with teenagers? Well, for one thing, he isn't. He doesn't give a s**t about you, or anyone else that has posted comments here has to say. What he does care about, however, is when celebrities begin endorsing things such as the 9/11 "truth movement". It begins to give the conspiracy some sort of validity. Albeit not much validity. As much as a coked-up, perverted, and has been celebrity can. Do I ever question things? Of course. Did I question the official 9/11 story initially? Of course. However, when there is zero proof, that's zero as in none, then there is no reason to keep believing in the conspiracy. The Loose Change video has been debunked.
stonecrusher420Mar 23, 2007
WHEN IT'S ALL OVER THEY WILL ALL UNDERSTAND WHY WE FOUGHT SO HARD!!!!!!!!!WHEN THEY SEE HOW IT WOULD'VE ENDED.........................THEY WILL BE HAPPY
andywhiteMar 24, 2007
Isn't Two and a Half Men the number one show? You official conspiracy theorists cant get anything right.
andywhiteMar 24, 2007
<a class="user" href="http://journalof911studies.com">http://journalof911studies.com</a><a class="user" href="http://911research.wtc7.net">http://911research.wtc7.net</a><a class="user" href="http://911proof.com">http://911proof.com</a><a class="user" href="http://patriotsquestion911.com">http://patriotsquestion911.com</a>
Closed AccountMar 24, 2007
@AndyWhiteI see that you've made yet another pointless and meaningless comment on a thread. I'm guessing that you come here and make these statements just to make yourself feel important. I bet you think that you're one hell of a funny guy. Well, you're not. You're pretty lame actually and every post of yours that I have seen has just been stupid. Log off, grow up and come back in six or seven years when you're mature enough to contribute something to the conversation.
Closed AccountMar 24, 2007
Webster Tarpley? Why would anyone debate a low-life that makes his living conning simpletons and the weak minded?AB Princeton 1966 in English and Italian, summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa. Fulbright Scholar at University of Turin, Italy. MA in humanities from Skidmore College.Obviously another highly qualified investigator in the truther movement.
maxpainMar 24, 2007
TerrorStormgoogle it
mreguyApr 2, 2007
@LooseCannon1:All the deniers and buriers, YOU AVOID acknowledging and examining the truth because IF you did, the moral imperative to DO something about it would be undeniable. INSTEAD you'd rather go back to your video games and ogling at Britney's pudenda.Read all about yourselves:<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_skepticism#Characteristics_of_pseudoskeptics">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_skepticism#Characteristics_of_pseudoskeptics</a>Characteristics of pseudoskepticsThe first extensive analysis of the term pseudoskepticism was conducted by Marcello Truzzi, Professor of Sociology at Eastern Michigan University, who in 1987 argued that pseudoskeptics show the following characteristics:* The tendency to deny, rather than doubt[2]* Double standards in the application of criticism[3]* The making of judgements without full inquiry[4]* Tendency to discredit, rather than investigate[5]* Use of ridicule or ad hominem attacks[6]* Presenting insufficient evidence or proof[7]* Pejorative labelling of proponents as 'promoters', 'pseudoscientists' or practitioners of 'pathological science.' [8]* Assuming criticism requires no burden of proof[9]* Making unsubstantiated counter-claims[10]* Counter-claims based on plausibility rather than empirical evidence[11]* Suggesting that unconvincing evidence is grounds for dismissing it[12]* Tendency to dismiss all evidenceThe official lie is crumbling.The pseudoskeptics and disinformationalists are outnumbered.The criminals aren't gonna get away with this one.They're all going to prison.Let's put the "Patriot Act" to good use.Traitors and tyrants: Don't f**k with my country.
mreguyApr 2, 2007
@ dshpls:What you're dealing with is called "cognitive dissonance". Basically, it's when people are frightened by something which challenges the security of their beliefs, whether right or not, and they try to block it out. Like when a child plugs his ears and sings, "LA, la, la, lala... Me no like, mommy--make the bad go-way!!"Cognitive dissonance is a psychological term which describes the uncomfortable tension that comes from holding two conflicting thoughts at the same time. More precisely, it is the perception of incompatibility between two cognitions, where "cognition" is defined as any element of knowledge, including attitude, emotion, belief, or behavior.<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance</a>
bassman2112Apr 3, 2007
Really guys , Mark Cuban has as much right as Michael Moore did to make 911 Fahrenheit ,, can someone tell me the difference . Bill O'reilly , Rush Limbooxcontin & all the neo-cons are trying to hide the truth since the illuminati's plan doesn't want this coming out yet , Everyone vote for Ron Paul !!! All the others are bought & apid for by the elite to destroy America like they already have done . Be smart , do your research if you haven't & you will see how evil & how much of a force these people will be to reckon with .We have our work cut out folks ., Never back down to O'reilly or any of these terrorists , keep up the fight !!!! We will defeat these criminals someday !!!Loose Change is no different from Mikey Moore's (another neo-con) film , difference is ::: The elite have no control over the content of this film !! Go Charlie & Mark & Dylan .. You guys are true American Hero's .BTW:: What is with these neo-cons with the JEWS,, Why do they refer to O'donnell & Cuban & Sheen to not liking jews ???? They say it over & over ,,Shawn Hannity too !!! What the hell does jews have to do with it ???That is like me saying , I don't like Pizza !!,, O'reilly says::: , HUH , what you say ?? You don't like Jews?? Mike ,,,ahh check em out ,,call the local authorities !This is totally bizzare , these people are looking for every reason to brainwash the viewers .. It won't work ,,it will make it better for the truth movement !!kEEP UP THE GREAT WORK !!
originalicedbApr 16, 2011
Awesome video and song featuring charlie: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0X4qBH8oOE