Listen. Dude. I don't know if you really care about honest debate or facts, or if you are just shoving your religion down everyone throats, but if you CARE(you don't) check this out.<a class="user" href="http://www.bogosity.tv/forum/index.php?topic=27.0">http://www.bogosity.tv/forum/index.php?topic=27.0</a>And I'll do ya one better. If you can come up with evidence that directly contradicts what these subtitles say(sources are available at the main site) I'll have a serious discussion with you.Otherwise you haven't proven anything about evolution- just that you don't understand the concept.
Wow missing link....I guess Steven Spielberg sure has something to say.... didn't he kill a bunch of dinosaurs in his movie? Yeah y'all paleontologists - Get him Get him :p heheheSeriously, visit <a class="user" href="http://www.explainstuff.com">http://www.explainstuff.com</a> to learn a scientific concept or fact everyday. Learn about facts related to history, science, discoveries, inventions, computers, software, mysteries and many many many more. Subscribe at explainstuff.com and brag about your knowledge with your friends.
holy s**t it was just a figure of speech not literally.shesh. loosen up people, who spend hours on digg reading peoples comments and i don't have a life.why the hell don't morons go extinct?
This/threadTry reading articles next time morons. Its funny how so many proclaim themselves intellectually superior to others who believe in God, yet those very same elitists cannot demonstrate sufficient ability to read and comprehend.
**cough, cough** Piltdown Man **cough, cough**"They claim in the paper that by examining the anatomy of adapids, these animals have something to do with the direct line of human ancestry and living monkeys and apes. This claim is buttressed with almost no evidence," said paleontologist Richard Kay of Duke University. "And they failed to cite a body of literature that's been going on since at least 1984 that presents evidence against their hypothesis." source - <a class="user" href="http://www.livescience.com/animals/090520-fossil-reactions.html">http://www.livescience.com/animals/090520-fossil-r ...</a>
I agree with you. I believe that Genesis is so old and has been translated through so many languages that you can't take it word for word- you have to take the meaning behind it. I think that Genesis is an elaborate way of saying 'God created the universe and humans, and all humans sin.'. When you think about it, that's all you need to take from the story. Don't take all the metaphorical filler about the moon emitting light and talking snakes literally like some Christians.
icyfenixMay 22, 2009
Listen. Dude. I don't know if you really care about honest debate or facts, or if you are just shoving your religion down everyone throats, but if you CARE(you don't) check this out.<a class="user" href="http://www.bogosity.tv/forum/index.php?topic=27.0">http://www.bogosity.tv/forum/index.php?topic=27.0</a>And I'll do ya one better. If you can come up with evidence that directly contradicts what these subtitles say(sources are available at the main site) I'll have a serious discussion with you.Otherwise you haven't proven anything about evolution- just that you don't understand the concept.
Closed AccountMay 24, 2009
Ahh, okay now I can read this article again. Thank you.
cujohnMay 25, 2009
Was it even carbondated <a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating</a>
explainstuffMay 29, 2009
Wow missing link....I guess Steven Spielberg sure has something to say.... didn't he kill a bunch of dinosaurs in his movie? Yeah y'all paleontologists - Get him Get him :p heheheSeriously, visit <a class="user" href="http://www.explainstuff.com">http://www.explainstuff.com</a> to learn a scientific concept or fact everyday. Learn about facts related to history, science, discoveries, inventions, computers, software, mysteries and many many many more. Subscribe at explainstuff.com and brag about your knowledge with your friends.
firefly2271May 30, 2009
Millions of years of evidence or a convoluted book based around sky god superstition.which makes sense?
greenleaflinkMay 30, 2009
holy s**t it was just a figure of speech not literally.shesh. loosen up people, who spend hours on digg reading peoples comments and i don't have a life.why the hell don't morons go extinct?
arowniousJun 3, 2009
This/threadTry reading articles next time morons. Its funny how so many proclaim themselves intellectually superior to others who believe in God, yet those very same elitists cannot demonstrate sufficient ability to read and comprehend.
kclorelei39Jun 6, 2009
**cough, cough** Piltdown Man **cough, cough**"They claim in the paper that by examining the anatomy of adapids, these animals have something to do with the direct line of human ancestry and living monkeys and apes. This claim is buttressed with almost no evidence," said paleontologist Richard Kay of Duke University. "And they failed to cite a body of literature that's been going on since at least 1984 that presents evidence against their hypothesis." source - <a class="user" href="http://www.livescience.com/animals/090520-fossil-reactions.html">http://www.livescience.com/animals/090520-fossil-r ...</a>
joshnovakJun 12, 2009
I agree with you. I believe that Genesis is so old and has been translated through so many languages that you can't take it word for word- you have to take the meaning behind it. I think that Genesis is an elaborate way of saying 'God created the universe and humans, and all humans sin.'. When you think about it, that's all you need to take from the story. Don't take all the metaphorical filler about the moon emitting light and talking snakes literally like some Christians.
scheibeOct 24, 2009
This was later shown to not even be a close relative.<a class="user" href="http://digg.com/general_sciences/Fossil_hailed_as_Man_s_ancestor_is_not_even_close_relative" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/general_sciences/Fossil_hailed_as_ ...</a>