physorg.com — Anna Patterson's last Internet search engine was so impressive that industry leader Google Inc. bought the technology in 2004 to upgrade its own system. She believes her latest invention is even more valuable - only this time it's not for sale.
Jul 28, 2008 View in Crawl 4
addicted68098Jul 28, 2008
Here is my first result when I type my name Kimi R?ikk?nen gets hardcore with ***** and ...
radiofrequencyJul 28, 2008
F**KIN' THING SUCKS!
topher06Jul 29, 2008
Why do people insist on non-words for Internet brand names? I don't even know how to pronounce Cuil. is it like Kyle or Coo-il or cull? It seems to me that the first failure of this startup is to market a brandname that people can easily identify with and incorporate into their everyday speech. Somehow I just can't see myself saying "Just Cuil that word to find out more about it".
tkeoJul 29, 2008
Heh :) Too late.There are already tons of custom search services out there which are 'beyond' Yahoo or Google and give much more clean search results than 'old monsters'. The main idea is that they deeply specialize in specific ares like real estate, automotive, gene data, etc, etc.For example check out one of them: web 2.0 search service for digital content and 3D models for game developers and general graphic designers:<a class="user" href="http://www.3dsn.com">http://www.3dsn.com</a>Sample search:Samsung:<a class="user" href="http://3dsn.com/#keywords=Samsung&category=13">http://3dsn.com/#keywords=Samsung&category=13</a>Nokia:<a class="user" href="http://3dsn.com/#keywords=Nokia&category=13">http://3dsn.com/#keywords=Nokia&category=13</a>Do Yahoo and Google provide better search results? I doubt.
mdmanJul 29, 2008
I tried the search engine, it sucks... does not even find sites you put in directly.. shows mostly spoofed porn and crap..
thenonhackerJul 30, 2008
I'll stick with Google for Web Search and Blog Alertsand Live.com for Image Search and Maps.