canadavotesronpaul.com— The Ron Paul Revolution is starting to catch fire in Canada. See why our Canadian friends think America should elect Ron Paul as their next president.
Dec 12, 2007View in Crawl 4
Even canadians? Try people from almost every free society around the world, they heard about someone trying to fix the US government and its policies. An economicly strong America following its constitution is something almost the whole world would love to see. Of course "voting" should be changes to "supporting" as they cannot vote.Supporting ron paul in america is like supporting Kasparov in Russia. Kasparov wants to fix the government for the sake of the people. Putin is protecting the establishment. We can see that because we are free from the russian system of propoganda. Just as others can see that Ron Paul's ideas would save america because they are free from the american propoganda machine. When russian media refuses to show Kasparov on TV equally with Putin its corruption, when we do it to Ron Paul, it is seen as nothing more than giving more time to the candidate the people will most likely vote for.
A few problems.1. Kasparov is brilliant. Paul is far from stupid, though I think his policies are just that, but he ain't no genius either. Listen to Kasparov give a speech. He's eloquent, insightful and tangibly knowledgeable. Now imagine what he must sound like speaking his native language.2. I personally support Kasparov's movement, but *by far* the majority of Russians do not, which gives him very, very little chance of actually affecting any real change. Is this really an analogy you want to draw?3. The situation in Russia is exponentially worse than the States. Trying to compare the 'Russian propaganda machine' and the US media is laughable. Moreover, it's insulting to the Russian and American publics to insinuate that the only reason they don't support Kasparov and Paul, respectively, is that they're ignorant. It's also not true.
cybrguyDec 12, 2007
Even canadians? Try people from almost every free society around the world, they heard about someone trying to fix the US government and its policies. An economicly strong America following its constitution is something almost the whole world would love to see. Of course "voting" should be changes to "supporting" as they cannot vote.Supporting ron paul in america is like supporting Kasparov in Russia. Kasparov wants to fix the government for the sake of the people. Putin is protecting the establishment. We can see that because we are free from the russian system of propoganda. Just as others can see that Ron Paul's ideas would save america because they are free from the american propoganda machine. When russian media refuses to show Kasparov on TV equally with Putin its corruption, when we do it to Ron Paul, it is seen as nothing more than giving more time to the candidate the people will most likely vote for.
ncairnsDec 12, 2007
A few problems.1. Kasparov is brilliant. Paul is far from stupid, though I think his policies are just that, but he ain't no genius either. Listen to Kasparov give a speech. He's eloquent, insightful and tangibly knowledgeable. Now imagine what he must sound like speaking his native language.2. I personally support Kasparov's movement, but *by far* the majority of Russians do not, which gives him very, very little chance of actually affecting any real change. Is this really an analogy you want to draw?3. The situation in Russia is exponentially worse than the States. Trying to compare the 'Russian propaganda machine' and the US media is laughable. Moreover, it's insulting to the Russian and American publics to insinuate that the only reason they don't support Kasparov and Paul, respectively, is that they're ignorant. It's also not true.