The solution is simple. If our government didn't have the Federal Reserve paper money system, they wouldn't be able to afford this vast and expensive military industrial complex. Whenever our politicians and bureaucrats want money for some new war they don't even have to tax us directly. They can just get the Fed to print them the money out of thin air... It's really insane.If you want to end the military industrial complex's existence, you'd want to abolish the Federal Reserve. That's why we as a country should start thinking about allowing private individuals to create competing currencies and allow individuals to compete against the Federal Reserve Bank. Allow us to choose what currency we'd like to trade with, instead of us being forced by our government into an unsustainable and war-enabling paper-money system. We should have the freedom to choose.
I'm unclear. If we didn't have prisons, we wouldn't have criminals? Back to formal logic class with you. Of course, the providers of prisoner services could hand the incarcerated a saw, hammer and nails and tell them to build their own shelter, grow their own food and maintain their intracommunity order but instead we actually house, feed and clothe these miscreants and provide gyms, computers, television, free cable, all the things they got use to in public housing where they never learned, however, how to fend for themselves legitimately. Put too many rats in a confined area and they attack each other, well, duh. Welcome to virtually any city.
Well, it is sort of a rhetorical question. When you have such pronounced effects, it is sort of moot to argue which is the primary effect and which is the side effect.
buckrogers1965Mar 13, 2009
Don't forget to budget in the interest we pay to service the debt on the loans that were spent on military projects. That is 300 billion a year alone.
batleycraigMar 14, 2009
global general strike now Utube
thinbevMar 14, 2009
The solution is simple. If our government didn't have the Federal Reserve paper money system, they wouldn't be able to afford this vast and expensive military industrial complex. Whenever our politicians and bureaucrats want money for some new war they don't even have to tax us directly. They can just get the Fed to print them the money out of thin air... It's really insane.If you want to end the military industrial complex's existence, you'd want to abolish the Federal Reserve. That's why we as a country should start thinking about allowing private individuals to create competing currencies and allow individuals to compete against the Federal Reserve Bank. Allow us to choose what currency we'd like to trade with, instead of us being forced by our government into an unsustainable and war-enabling paper-money system. We should have the freedom to choose.
lamadave222Mar 14, 2009
I'm unclear. If we didn't have prisons, we wouldn't have criminals? Back to formal logic class with you. Of course, the providers of prisoner services could hand the incarcerated a saw, hammer and nails and tell them to build their own shelter, grow their own food and maintain their intracommunity order but instead we actually house, feed and clothe these miscreants and provide gyms, computers, television, free cable, all the things they got use to in public housing where they never learned, however, how to fend for themselves legitimately. Put too many rats in a confined area and they attack each other, well, duh. Welcome to virtually any city.
batleycraigMar 14, 2009
www.trueworldhistory.info www.mkultra #11 or wikipedia ewan cameron
dailycrowMar 16, 2009
You are being facetious… I hope. facetious [fass-see-shuss]Adjective:~ joking, or trying to be amusing, esp. at inappropriate times
dailycrowMar 17, 2009
ahh,I did not know that. Thumbs up for the heads up. I'm a little bit wiser for it.
johnnysoftwareAug 26, 2009
Well, it is sort of a rhetorical question. When you have such pronounced effects, it is sort of moot to argue which is the primary effect and which is the side effect.
johnnysoftwareAug 26, 2009
Cough, he was a former United States military General.
johnnysoftwareAug 26, 2009
He was a Republican but he was not a neocon. He was a different brand of Republican.