youtube.com — Do you work in a large office building? Then you should know about this recently discovered flaw in ALL EXISTING BUILDING CODES AND FIRE REGULATIONS that could cause the complete collapse of your office building. For more information on this phenonmenon, please email NIST at wtc@nist.gov
Nov 11, 2008 View in Crawl 4
Closed AccountNov 11, 2008
You're kidding, right?
Closed AccountNov 12, 2008
Did you not read the article I posted, Jimmy? How can you claim that the plane strikes had no bearing when it was more than obvious that the point of failure in both towers was the point where the planes struck? Are you claiming now that the planes struck at the exact point where you allege that explosives were planted and did so without setting those explosives off or destroying them in the ensuing fire? Do you really feel that's a reasonable belief?
inoblaNov 12, 2008
"no bearing as a collapse mechanism. "Take another hit Jimmy.
jimmyb207Nov 12, 2008
I've had this exact argument with you before Herk. And more than once at that. I believe there were options as to where the collapse sequence could begin. Where the planes struck mattered not. Quiz for inobla...1. The WTC 1 & 2 were designed to WITHSTAND a direct hit from what type of aircraft?( Hint...the engineers were smart enough back then to realize that planes needed FUEL in them to fly.)
maxtangentNov 12, 2008
Why? Did Jimmy escape her k's parallel universe? You know, the one where the expert admits he doesn't understand what happened and her k uses him in a lame attempt at proving a point? The one where Appeal to Ridicule, Ad Hominem, Srawman and other fallacies take the place of actual debate?Everyone should be congratulated for managing to evade the Hypocritical liar her k's black hole version of reality - which takes only a little common sense and a small measure of critical thinking ability.