alphex: I have posted a comparison but the dropbox shills and spammers down voted it since their feature list is not as complete as sugarsync.Here it is:Objective Comparison:Dropbox = Windows, Mac, Linux, iPhone interfaceSugarSync = Windows, Mac, iPhone interface, iPhone native app (in app store free!), Blackberry native app, Windows Mobile native appIf you don't have a phone and don't need to sync photos or files from your phone to the service and you have a Linux machine, go for Dropbox.If you don't have a Linux machine but you have a phone and you value mobile connectivity and automatic syncing with your phone (and not just a viewer), go with SugarSync.
Sorry. It's just that sensitivities are always high regarding people gaming Digg.If you had left a comment that said something to the effect of "Hi, I'm one of the devs, please try the beta and drop us some feedback" you likely would have been dugg up high and people would have given you some kudos.At any rate, Dropbox seems like a good idea with a good implementation. I look forward to using it sometime. When I do use it, I plan on using the Linux client. Thanks for your efforts.
erroneusSep 12, 2008
It never occoured to you that many of the commenters could be Dropbox alpha users, there are pretty big number of those acutally.
raccoSep 12, 2008
ah, an iPhone optimized web interface. works quite well. Dropbox just got even better
supersaucerSep 12, 2008
alphex: I have posted a comparison but the dropbox shills and spammers down voted it since their feature list is not as complete as sugarsync.Here it is:Objective Comparison:Dropbox = Windows, Mac, Linux, iPhone interfaceSugarSync = Windows, Mac, iPhone interface, iPhone native app (in app store free!), Blackberry native app, Windows Mobile native appIf you don't have a phone and don't need to sync photos or files from your phone to the service and you have a Linux machine, go for Dropbox.If you don't have a Linux machine but you have a phone and you value mobile connectivity and automatic syncing with your phone (and not just a viewer), go with SugarSync.
jaysonb10Sep 12, 2008
Anyone have issues with Dropbox being a resource hog?
braveryonionsSep 15, 2008
Some of that stuff is just wrong since this public launch.
cooppw02Sep 17, 2008
Sorry. It's just that sensitivities are always high regarding people gaming Digg.If you had left a comment that said something to the effect of "Hi, I'm one of the devs, please try the beta and drop us some feedback" you likely would have been dugg up high and people would have given you some kudos.At any rate, Dropbox seems like a good idea with a good implementation. I look forward to using it sometime. When I do use it, I plan on using the Linux client. Thanks for your efforts.
londonroadSep 23, 2008
This app is superb. I use a Mac and two PCs. I am just waiting for the catch, as this is too good to be true.
driversplazaJan 20, 2009
i had seen that in many websites... here too - <a class="user" href="http://www.techlookz.com/application-downloads/">http://www.techlookz.com/application-downloads/</a>
kiszkasanApr 25, 2009
I am using dropbox for my site and it rocks<a class="user" href="http://amsterdam-seed-bank.com">http://amsterdam-seed-bank.com</a>