nytimes.com — Maybe they will, maybe they won't... but their track record sucks and it's all about the money so f**k you California thanks to AltaRock Energy, will begin using methods that have previously set off earthquakes in Switzerland to drill deep into ground laced with fault lines in an area two hours? drive north of San Francisco.
Jun 24, 2009 View in Crawl 4
jcpuddJun 24, 2009
Are you surprised? Their CEO is Lex Luther.
philodygmnJun 25, 2009
I said sustainable, dips**t. If you think it's worthwhile to extract at its glacial rate of accumulation and in a way impossible to massively destabilize geology as industrial extraction has already demonstrably done on multiple occasions, feel free to write the venture capital grant proposals!
Closed AccountJun 26, 2009
DRILL THE FAULT LINE - DO IT I DARE YA
Closed AccountJun 26, 2009
Except there is an INSANE amount of stress on the San Andreas fault, and it could very well trigger "the big one" that's been long overdue for decades.
altgeeky1Jun 26, 2009
That's why conservatives love energy companies!
Closed AccountJun 26, 2009
Let me revise my statement:We don't need the ENERGY. We can always just buy it from our good friends in HatesAmerica-stan. ________________Jesus! This bulls**t was in the NY Times?
wrekJun 26, 2009
Sounds like a Clive Cussler novel...
thorpeJun 26, 2009
Cool, thanks. I've learnt a valuable lesson.
philodygmnJun 27, 2009
^You certainly did not say "sustainable", ****, you said "non-renewable". Dips**t indeed.^*lol* Because non-renewability is sooooo sustainable! If you've figured how to make something that's not even renewable in the first place sustainable, I invite you to write the business plans for the technologies with which you're going to turn the world inside-out and presumably rake in trillions upon trillions of dollars! Losing, f**king fool. Sure, I used the word non-renewable, _because that's even less_ sustainable than "un-"sustainable! It's the _ultimate definition_ of unsustainable! What I _said_ _was_ sustainability, even if I never used the words -- oh, but that would require a mind to _understand_ what was said instead of a bird-brain throwing an exception based on vocabulary. Maybe Digg has started attracting chatbot griefers for some mischevious hacker's bemusement, because that response is so brain-dead it can't possibly have come from a functional human.