youtube.com— The Congressman discusses the G-20 summit taking place in Washington this weekend that will address the global monetary system.
Nov 14, 2008View in Crawl 4
I use black as a descriptor only, but for the 95% of the blacks that voted for the interloper simply because of his color are all about race! They will be hurt the most by his ideas..which of course are not his own!
fadeout- Remember this?<a class="user" href="http://digg.com/politics/Ron_Paul_is_Not_A_Bigot_Refuting_the_New_Republic_Charges">http://digg.com/politics/Ron_Paul_is_Not_A_Bigot_R ...</a> That is where all of your assertions about the great Dr, Ron Paul were completely debunked. Ron Paul has been elected to the 111th Congress and won his primary by an overwhelming 3 to 1 marging proving you and his other critics wrong. You have yet to be able to show me where to find one second of video or audio that backs up your lame assertions about the great Dr. Ron Paul. I have been his supporter since the seventies. I have listed and watched the man for a very long time. He's not a racist, but I think you could be, that would explain why you are so ignorant that you can't even read an article. So, be a man. Read the article and admit you are wrong. That is far better than people laughing at you for being a fool, isn't it? That's what happens every time you accuse the great Dr. Ron Paul of bigotry or racism. Unless of course you can find me one second of video or audio that backs up your claim.
Since the purchasing power of my shiny rocks [See: Title 31 U.S.C. section 5112(a)] has quadrupled in the last four years I am open to more dumb ideas.
Primary Source please? Citation please? If you can provide a verifiable primary source I will happily pay you $50 (FRN). No Joke. You provide a Primary Source for the quote in question and I will happily PayPal you $50 once I have verified it. Should be easy for you.
@citizenBNWAre you interested in proving from a verifiable source that 9/11 wasn't an inside job?Look, I appreciate that this is an issue of noteworthy and readily apparent concern for you. I think we can probably see eye to eye on a lot of things, and I’m not saying that you are wrong per se. However, I simply do not have the time to invest in the kind of scholarly work that you are asking of me. I see the link that you reference. It’s a good link. Cool. When I refer to quotes, basically I just cut and paste from random sites featuring people's quotes. This is the Internet, baby!But let me also ask you this. Is there any question that Thomas Jefferson would DISAGREE with the quote? Also, it's been over 200 years,... who is to say that the "history" books which you might consider to be quality are accurate, anyway? We could debate this forever and a day, unless we were willing to come to a point where we can begin to make certain agreements with each other. Which would be good! :)THAT BEING SAID, I have a counter-proposal for you! If you can instead provide me with a link (or links) that contain a variety of Thomas Jefferson quotes that meets your excellent scholarly approval, AND does not castrate the sweet Libertarian beauty and power of Jefferson’s mind, motivations, and awesome power of speech (by excluding all the really juicy quotes), I will draw on those resources in the future when quoting Jefferson on Digg. ALL FOR YOU, and for the general purpose of keeping the peace. And hey, you don’t even have to pay me $50! LOL! What do you say? ;) :)
lazerus9Nov 15, 2008
I use black as a descriptor only, but for the 95% of the blacks that voted for the interloper simply because of his color are all about race! They will be hurt the most by his ideas..which of course are not his own!
Closed AccountNov 15, 2008
fadeout- Remember this?<a class="user" href="http://digg.com/politics/Ron_Paul_is_Not_A_Bigot_Refuting_the_New_Republic_Charges">http://digg.com/politics/Ron_Paul_is_Not_A_Bigot_R ...</a> That is where all of your assertions about the great Dr, Ron Paul were completely debunked. Ron Paul has been elected to the 111th Congress and won his primary by an overwhelming 3 to 1 marging proving you and his other critics wrong. You have yet to be able to show me where to find one second of video or audio that backs up your lame assertions about the great Dr. Ron Paul. I have been his supporter since the seventies. I have listed and watched the man for a very long time. He's not a racist, but I think you could be, that would explain why you are so ignorant that you can't even read an article. So, be a man. Read the article and admit you are wrong. That is far better than people laughing at you for being a fool, isn't it? That's what happens every time you accuse the great Dr. Ron Paul of bigotry or racism. Unless of course you can find me one second of video or audio that backs up your claim.
vbullingerNov 15, 2008
Apparently, he's looking for a magic wand to make all of those ideas a reality with no help from us (especially none from Striker101).
Closed AccountNov 15, 2008
Quality quotes.
lawofnationsNov 15, 2008
Since the purchasing power of my shiny rocks [See: Title 31 U.S.C. section 5112(a)] has quadrupled in the last four years I am open to more dumb ideas.
lawofnationsNov 15, 2008
A high concentration of melanin is never an issue.
lazerus9Nov 15, 2008
She would have been a much better candidate.
Closed AccountNov 16, 2008
He said he loves Obama. Not supports him. It's possible to like and admire someone without supporting their policies.
citizenbnwNov 17, 2008
Primary Source please? Citation please? If you can provide a verifiable primary source I will happily pay you $50 (FRN). No Joke. You provide a Primary Source for the quote in question and I will happily PayPal you $50 once I have verified it. Should be easy for you.
globalistshillNov 17, 2008
@citizenBNWAre you interested in proving from a verifiable source that 9/11 wasn't an inside job?Look, I appreciate that this is an issue of noteworthy and readily apparent concern for you. I think we can probably see eye to eye on a lot of things, and I’m not saying that you are wrong per se. However, I simply do not have the time to invest in the kind of scholarly work that you are asking of me. I see the link that you reference. It’s a good link. Cool. When I refer to quotes, basically I just cut and paste from random sites featuring people's quotes. This is the Internet, baby!But let me also ask you this. Is there any question that Thomas Jefferson would DISAGREE with the quote? Also, it's been over 200 years,... who is to say that the "history" books which you might consider to be quality are accurate, anyway? We could debate this forever and a day, unless we were willing to come to a point where we can begin to make certain agreements with each other. Which would be good! :)THAT BEING SAID, I have a counter-proposal for you! If you can instead provide me with a link (or links) that contain a variety of Thomas Jefferson quotes that meets your excellent scholarly approval, AND does not castrate the sweet Libertarian beauty and power of Jefferson’s mind, motivations, and awesome power of speech (by excluding all the really juicy quotes), I will draw on those resources in the future when quoting Jefferson on Digg. ALL FOR YOU, and for the general purpose of keeping the peace. And hey, you don’t even have to pay me $50! LOL! What do you say? ;) :)