plentyoffish.wordpress.com — "I think digg.com wins the worst infrustructure/setup award of any major site hands down." Massive bloat and poor architecture has resulted in digg requiring a huge number of servers to handle a relatively light load compared to other popular sites. "If their [myspace] infrastructure was as bad as digg.com’s they would need 18,750 servers!!!"
Feb 19, 2007 View in Crawl 4
nwilyFeb 20, 2007
I must admit, I was intrigued by the title. I read the link, and on the surface, it seems interesting. Here's the thing: find the source for the "75 servers" number. I dare you. It's a footnote in the "Howstuffworks" article. The exact quote is "Digg has 12 employees [ref] and about 75 servers." It doesn't say "75 production web servers." I would wager a significant number are development, testing, email, redundancy, not to mention any number of internal use machines.
ajmooFeb 20, 2007
you are a tool :)
Closed AccountFeb 20, 2007Submitter
Dev servers would be an inconsequential amount - they may face stress testing but aside from that they'd have a very small user load. Mail servers would be inconsequential, "email this" is unlikely to be as common as pageviews. The vast majority of the 75 would be web and database. I would be very surprised if they have even 15 mail & development servers."In the Diggnation podcast recorded on June 14, 2006, Kevin Rose puts the total number of servers in the area of 75."<a class="user" href="http://computer.howstuffworks.com/digg1.htm">http://computer.howstuffworks.com/digg1.htm</a>
trnscndrFeb 20, 2007
This is silly. Digg is far more technologically advanced than others. I have 3 employees including me and we have 12 servers including those in productivity service. But, I'm no networking guy. I assume Digg is claiming productivity, R&D as part of their 75. Plus I would say having too much hardware is better than NOT enough.
mdquSep 10, 2008
Go get a girl, Markus.