373 Comments

• Digg
• Bury

I think people who digg stories just because of the title are just not that bright. I read what I digg. I happen to really be into Ron Paul but I also like technology and software info as well. I am tired of the duplicate stories on Ron Paul and also tired of people who are not reading or commenting on stories about him and just digging them up. I have buried lots of stories like that.

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

This means 90% of Digg users will be banned.Excellent. It's time people saw Digg for the strict editor-controlled, fascist management it has.Related:<a class="user" href="http://insignificantthoughts.com/2006/04/20/someone-else-who-thinks-digg-sucks/&quot;&gt;http://insignificantthoughts.com/2006/04/20/someone-else-who-thinks-digg-sucks/&lt;/a&gt;

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

I am actually more inclined to digg an article that I have not read, rather then one I have. I digg so I can come back to it later. If I read it, like it, and digest it, I don't digg it.

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

I think part of it has to do with the fact that at some sites there was a partisan bent. I'm not all for republicans, democrats, people who want norby the robot in the office or anything slanting anything. I just believe in liberating information and not slanting it.When you think about it it kind of is a nice policy. I just had an idea- I want to make a "Dirty Harry" or Al Capone shirt where he's got his gun out and is all tough and he's like "Read A Book!!" Cmon is that cool or what? And then more people would read more or want to read.Peace,-Mike

• Reply