911blogger.com — "At the World Trade Center, three buildings came down like demolition and two of them were hit by a plane, but the third one... they said "do you want us to pull it?" and they pulled it and it looked just like the other two."Entire David Lynch 9/11 Interview:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8175484657963455824&sourceid=docidfeed&hl=en
Dec 6, 2006 View in Crawl 4
stallion4Dec 7, 2006Submitter
"...you don't have to believe everything in the documentary to still have questions come up... and you look back and you remember what you saw, and what you were told, and now, you have questions." -David LynchI actually prefer this documentary over LC:9/11 Mysteries <a class="user" href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003</a>
ersatzphiDec 7, 2006
Ah yes because David Lynch is renowned for his knowledge of physics and demolition and we should take this opinion as some sort of guide.Wake the hell up people.
Closed AccountDec 7, 2006
9/11 was an inside job, Only somebody who is braindead doesnt believe in a cover up, AND Anybody who doesnt see this as an inside job, I hope they are not on a jury, They are just stupid.
tiduDec 7, 2006
oh god not these again...
omgitscolinDec 7, 2006
Would you guys please learn to use the freakin' reply button?
tharjuDec 7, 2006
the video points out some interesting things but i am not qualify to judge what caused those puffs before the building collapse. It could also be because of the falling debris inside the building before the actual collapse of the building. i dont know.I still don;t believe that the gov;t is behind this. what is the motive? i don't see any good motives that one must have to destroy this economic infrastructure of this county. unless there was a person like hitler or stalin or polpot in the gov't. as much as i disapprove of this guy Bush, i dont think he is capable of doing such thing.
mrebusDec 7, 2006
people on the net seem to really think that 9/11 was an inside job. Besides that evidence that they use to support there argument is weak. The question that I ask all the "inside jobers" out there is What would it take for you to believe that it wasn't an inside job? And remember there will always be unanswered questions out there. Please don't tell me I am a lemming or that I just missed all the evidence that you read. I have see all allot of the online docs out there and read allot about 911. However I have also read sites that debunk the conspiracies too.
stallion4Dec 7, 2006Submitter
Cui bono?
soarinDec 7, 2006
Mrebus, thanks for approaching the issue in an intelligent way.On 9/11, my roommate said immediately "Bush did it" -- I thought she was crazy for saying so, and for months afterward thought it was a ridiculous idea. However, I started seeing questions that would never get answered correctly, and a lot of things did not seem to add up. In order for me to start believing the "Official" conspiracy theory, I need GOOD answers to the following questions:1) Why did Rumsfeld announce the "loss" of 2.3 TRILLION dollars on the Monday before 9/11? The standard practice for a while had been to announce that kind of news on a Friday so it would be "old" news on Monday - Announcing it on a Monday would have given it life for the whole week, unless there was a larger news story coming. 2.3 Trillion at the time was 1/3 of the entire money supply in the nation -- that kind of money doesn't just "disappear".2) The section of the Pentagon that was hit was the one with all the people who were looking for the money -- how convenient that they died and the records were destroyed. a) The section they were in was the only one reinforced against a terrorist attackb) The exact scenario had been "wargamed" and prepared for years earlier.c) there was a missile battery on the White Housed) there was an airforce base 12 miles down the roade) there was an hour's lead time from the time the WTC was attacked until the Pentagon was attackedf) no alarms were raised in the Pentagon even though everyone was watching the plane fly on in super-sophisticated radar systems and emergency drills were held all summer before that, so that the accountants complained that they had a hard time getting their job done.3) Why were "wargames" being held that day using the same scenario as the real events? 5 separate wargames were being held simultaneously, which tied up the nation's air defense systems and took most of the fighter jets too far away to help.<a class="user" href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/911/norad.htm">http://www.prisonplanet.com/911/norad.htm</a>a) in the London bombings of 7/7 there were official exercises using the exact same times and the exact same targets as the real events. <a class="user" href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=HCB1LwLM_UE">http://youtube.com/watch?v=HCB1LwLM_UE</a>Spending $500 billion a year on "defense" and having your Pentagon almost being taken out by a jet with an hour's warning is like having a house full of guns but having your leg chewed off by a chihuahua with an hour's warning, but even less likely.These are just some of the questions that remain about one part of 9/11, and there are many many more. Operation Northwoods <a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods</a> shows that the US military has been quite willing to dupe American Citizens with fake terror attacks, and Cheney does not seem to be any more caring than those people, but quite the opposite.I don't have my beliefs set in stone, and I keep an open mind, but the people who are promoting the official story don't even have answers to these questions, yet alone satisfactory answers to the other questions. If Enron had a plan to screw up California electricity for their own gain, and screw their own employees and investors while their stock fraud scheme exploded, and Worldcom had a plan to defraud America to the tune of 100's of billions of dollars, why is it so unlikely that there are others who think the same way and have even bigger schemes?