pensitoreview.com — I thought Dan Rather?s suit against CBS for wrongful dismissal was a big joke, since it took him two years to get up the gumption to file it. But then it was reported that he could be calling George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush to testify as material witnesses...and it could happen, if the suit isn?t settled and goes to trial.
Sep 29, 2007 View in Crawl 4
fyberopticSep 30, 2007
She said "all the information here is correct". And no, none of the documents were proven false, especially since only the Killian ones were the ones brought into question. What about all the other evidence in the report?Yeah, learn to do some research before you try to spread more of this BS.
jamihabsSep 30, 2007
She said she didn't type them. Rumors about Bush's National Gard service have been swirling around for decades. The one thing that has kept all this manusha in the rummer world and not the credible news story world has been the lack of evidence. Dan Rather and CBS broke this story and brought it into the news story world, weeks before the election, based on documents that have proved to be false. Now poor Dan is upset that he bought this crap hook line and sinker and his credibility has been trashed.
Closed AccountSep 30, 2007
So questioning the authenticity of obvious forgeries is now "swiftboating?" You've got some brass claiming dirty tricks and mudslinging, as that exactly describes what Rather and CBS did.
bonermachineSep 30, 2007
Actually, the information on the documents was entirely accurate. The documents themselves were reproduced in order to protect the original source, and there has never been any evidence brought forward that conflicted with the content of the documents Rather used.
phatt_mattOct 1, 2007
First there were imaginary documents and now there are imaginary court cases. Go Dan!