guardian.co.uk— Developing countries react furiously to leaked draft agreement that would hand more power to rich nations, sideline the UN's negotiating role and abandon the Kyoto protocol
Dec 8, 2009View in Crawl 4
Feel free to post some evidence that isn't based on the already manipulated data then.As for India, the path for them to prosperity is through their intelligence and through the shear numbers of people. I work for a company that has a branch there and most of the people that work there are amazing in terms of their mental capacity and abilities. Of course they were also in school for 10 hours a day and often had to do their lab work at 3:00 AM because that was the only time available due to the competition. And most of India is dirt poor, you need to do some investigation about how a majority of Indians heat their homes, then look at why they couldn't possible sign on to such an agreement.I am not the one that needs to learn science. Oh...and I could debate with you what the findings are in the whole climate gambit, is really science after all. It seems to me that it can't be proven, since the hypothesis is wrong. That is why the data has to be manipulated and people who don't agree must be silenced. Until the hypothesis can't be proved wrong it is not science.
Well yeah, that's why I'm studying science! So that I can get in on this and become one of these conspirators. I'll take my secret payouts collected by horrible taxes from poor hard working middle-class-soon-to-be lower-class people.It's just that easy!
Well here in the US the "major" media has yet to mention the emails from East Anglia. They have a lot invested in this global warming scam & they don't want the truth to get in the way.
Denmark, UK, and US cooked this text, in secrecy, before the Copenhagen Summit. Americans are brainwash to reject the word Conspiracy.Well, check the dictionary.Conspiracies are a FACT, not a theory. Since the first civilizations, Egypt, Babylon, Rome, etcetera.conspiracies are the way the few "powerful", control and benefits from the many.They (the few), could not, do it, without conspire in secrecy.Barrack Hussein Obama is a traitor to his half race, and his half ancestry and his family in Africa. And he is a" Charlatan Nobel Prize" , Lier to the World..<a linkindex="653" class="user" href="<a class="user" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/copenhagen-climate-change&quot;" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/ ...</a> rel="nofollow"><a class="user" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/</a> ...</a>
Taxes are great tools that can be used to change incentives. In the case of public goods, they can help account for negative externalities that are not accounted for in the market price.If you do not want to raise taxes, to limit the growth rate of the economy, you can simply lower taxes that produce poor incentives while raising taxes where they will produce good incentives. ie, less income tax, more consumption tax, especially on those activities that create negative externalities. Income taxes create incentives to work less, while consumption taxes create incentives to consume [a particular good] less.You should really start listening to economists rather than politicians.
You really should do some fact checking. The consensus among the scientific community was the earth is warming when that time magazine was released.Why time magazine ran that article, I do not know but I wouldn't be surprised if it was because it was such a stark contrast to the rest of the scientific community. Nonetheless, it doesn't matter as it would go on to receive a sound debunking.Anyways, great job on continuing the conservative tradition of being agents of disinformation, and believing it's all a conspiracy.
phydeaux70Dec 8, 2009
Feel free to post some evidence that isn't based on the already manipulated data then.As for India, the path for them to prosperity is through their intelligence and through the shear numbers of people. I work for a company that has a branch there and most of the people that work there are amazing in terms of their mental capacity and abilities. Of course they were also in school for 10 hours a day and often had to do their lab work at 3:00 AM because that was the only time available due to the competition. And most of India is dirt poor, you need to do some investigation about how a majority of Indians heat their homes, then look at why they couldn't possible sign on to such an agreement.I am not the one that needs to learn science. Oh...and I could debate with you what the findings are in the whole climate gambit, is really science after all. It seems to me that it can't be proven, since the hypothesis is wrong. That is why the data has to be manipulated and people who don't agree must be silenced. Until the hypothesis can't be proved wrong it is not science.
mikeymondaviDec 9, 2009
The climate changes, but tax scams never go away...
surbrusDec 9, 2009
Well yeah, that's why I'm studying science! So that I can get in on this and become one of these conspirators. I'll take my secret payouts collected by horrible taxes from poor hard working middle-class-soon-to-be lower-class people.It's just that easy!
Closed AccountDec 9, 2009
Well here in the US the "major" media has yet to mention the emails from East Anglia. They have a lot invested in this global warming scam & they don't want the truth to get in the way.
Closed AccountDec 9, 2009
Denmark, UK, and US cooked this text, in secrecy, before the Copenhagen Summit. Americans are brainwash to reject the word Conspiracy.Well, check the dictionary.Conspiracies are a FACT, not a theory. Since the first civilizations, Egypt, Babylon, Rome, etcetera.conspiracies are the way the few "powerful", control and benefits from the many.They (the few), could not, do it, without conspire in secrecy.Barrack Hussein Obama is a traitor to his half race, and his half ancestry and his family in Africa. And he is a" Charlatan Nobel Prize" , Lier to the World..<a linkindex="653" class="user" href="<a class="user" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/copenhagen-climate-change&quot;" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/ ...</a> rel="nofollow"><a class="user" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/</a> ...</a>
surbrusDec 10, 2009
Taxes are great tools that can be used to change incentives. In the case of public goods, they can help account for negative externalities that are not accounted for in the market price.If you do not want to raise taxes, to limit the growth rate of the economy, you can simply lower taxes that produce poor incentives while raising taxes where they will produce good incentives. ie, less income tax, more consumption tax, especially on those activities that create negative externalities. Income taxes create incentives to work less, while consumption taxes create incentives to consume [a particular good] less.You should really start listening to economists rather than politicians.
dikkyDec 11, 2009
You really should do some fact checking. The consensus among the scientific community was the earth is warming when that time magazine was released.Why time magazine ran that article, I do not know but I wouldn't be surprised if it was because it was such a stark contrast to the rest of the scientific community. Nonetheless, it doesn't matter as it would go on to receive a sound debunking.Anyways, great job on continuing the conservative tradition of being agents of disinformation, and believing it's all a conspiracy.