valleywag.com— Takeaway: The Senate Commerce Committee ran a pro-big-media marketing campaign disguised as a "bipartisan poll." The message is obvious: the committee is in bed with telcos and Net Neutrality is dead.
Sep 20, 2006View in Crawl 4
"Using profanity anywhere but in uncontrollable anger, shows that you are either stupid, and/or you're just plain rude"Or you just finished watching South Park and you're brainwashed by the minions of Satan. But you get better."Grow up."Yeah. Look what happened to Lenny Bruce, for f**k's sake.
@xJVz: $200/mo. is a bit out-of-the-question for some of us. My family is paying $40/mo. for 1.5Mbps DSL, as it is.My only choice (along with hundreds of other middle-classmen) - if our government fails us, once again - is to unplug.
As Vader would say: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO *gasp* OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Is it just me or does anyone else find it interesting that the "hide" the net neutrality question at the end of a survey that someone randomly got called about.... they probably just want to get off the phone by that time and that they had no idea (in general) what net neutrality was. Maybe it's also just me, but in my Psychology 101 class in school we learned that the wording of a questionnaire affects the probable outcome of the questionnaire. Meaning that proper wording must be chosen to make the questionnaire neutral not leading the respondent in any direction.Everyone knows that better service for a cheaper price is going to win out to the uninformed over something that they have no idea what it really is talking about.
osjprSep 20, 2006
Republican supporters will try to quietly ignore this like most of the other bs.
osjprSep 20, 2006
If you can give me a better list than this, please oblige.<a class="user" href="http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Examples_of_Republican_hypocrisy_on_moral_values">http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Examples_of_Republican_hypocrisy_on_moral_values</a>
twangoSep 20, 2006
"Using profanity anywhere but in uncontrollable anger, shows that you are either stupid, and/or you're just plain rude"Or you just finished watching South Park and you're brainwashed by the minions of Satan. But you get better."Grow up."Yeah. Look what happened to Lenny Bruce, for f**k's sake.
qoogirlSep 20, 2006
I agree with your comment about city WiFi @Interex! It sort of makes a lot of sense...!
jollaSep 20, 2006
Sign the f**k up!<a class="user" href="http://www.quaker.org/chestnuthill/prgsecty.htm">http://www.quaker.org/chestnuthill/prgsecty.htm</a>
aaronhoffmanSep 20, 2006
@xJVz: $200/mo. is a bit out-of-the-question for some of us. My family is paying $40/mo. for 1.5Mbps DSL, as it is.My only choice (along with hundreds of other middle-classmen) - if our government fails us, once again - is to unplug.
cherrytzorsSep 21, 2006
As Vader would say: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO *gasp* OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
tetfsuSep 21, 2006
Is it just me or does anyone else find it interesting that the "hide" the net neutrality question at the end of a survey that someone randomly got called about.... they probably just want to get off the phone by that time and that they had no idea (in general) what net neutrality was. Maybe it's also just me, but in my Psychology 101 class in school we learned that the wording of a questionnaire affects the probable outcome of the questionnaire. Meaning that proper wording must be chosen to make the questionnaire neutral not leading the respondent in any direction.Everyone knows that better service for a cheaper price is going to win out to the uninformed over something that they have no idea what it really is talking about.