blog.wired.com — A California man filed suit in state court Tuesday against internet service provider Comcast, arguing that the company's secret use of technology to limit peer-to-peer applications such as BitTorrent violates federal computer fraud laws, their user contracts and anti-fraudulent advertising statutes.
Nov 14, 2007 View in Crawl 4
harajukukeiNov 15, 2007
azureus... force encryption
brodelNov 15, 2007
"Vote this s**t down so no one has to waste their time reading empty drivel."Per your request, you have been dugg down. You're welcome.
Closed AccountNov 15, 2007
The plaintiff should hire you to present that explanation to the jury. That was fantastic. You can also give the jurors some cookies - you know, to sweeten them up a bit (or would that be considered bribery?) ;)
Closed AccountNov 15, 2007
Ok, ok - in that case Comcast disconnected his expletive after the first letter ;)
wiiniNov 15, 2007
I love all you guys shouting about being part of a Class-action lawsuit... but I'll be damned if I can get you to go outside and vote.
hikrillNov 15, 2007
I feel for u man, i was so fricking angry, told the network abuse guy to f**k off, i am switching to DSL... DSL is somewhat slower, but it is all I have, nothing til FiOS comes.H~
skabyssNov 16, 2007
Its cumcast because they blow all over your back once they're done f**king you.