Dugg up and applauded. I'm not registered for either party, but I supported Clinton, and I agree. He was hamstrung by Wag the Dog comments, but he also put himself in a position for them to be made. *we may differ here but...*The man HAD to know an entire political machine was geared up to get him. Christ, he was messing about with Monica while the I.C. was going on. At least FDR had the brains to keep his mistress discreet. Hell, he died in her bed, but you don't see anyone claim he got involved in WWII to distract anyone from finding out about her....
Once again, you did not respond to Neal Gabler or fox giving Alan Colmes a radio show. Or the liberal democrats that are on Fox News. I looked up the equal time thing, which are mostly from liberal media watch dog groups like media matters, which is real credible(not), or FAIR, same lack of credibility. Brit Hume is one of the most respected journalist like I said. He even received the 2004 broadcaster of the year award. And he worked as the chief white house correspondent of ABC for years. Chris Wallace also worked for ABC for 15 years and for NBC as their chief white house correspondent during the 1980's. And also has received many awards for journalism.The reason I mentioned Keith Olbermann was because you were suggesting since Brit has republicans during the very short interview segment on his show that he loses credibility. A very short segment does not make his whole show biased. Keith Olbermann has all democrats on and liberals seem to think that he is the best thing since Edward R. Murrow.For you to say that the democrats on Fox are not liberal enough is your problem. They are there and they present their views. And I don't work for Fox, am not a troll, and simply defend FoxNews when it is unfairly criticized.
I think its the smirk that the current administration has adopted. Even Rice did it during an interview on 60 Minutes last night. It just comes off as really skeezy.Oh and they lie and dodge and then lie again. They've taken advantage of immediate distribution such that any fact checking always comes well after their lies have been accepted as fact.
Guys, just block Zethris, It is widely known that he is a f**king moron that always spews innacuracies...You respond to him, and you simply give him more folks looking at what stupid s**t he posted. Just block him and talk to real people, not this shill.
@xen0blue"Why was there ever anything in the news about him trying to catch him if he was 'trying so hard'? Why hadn't anyone ever heard of bin laden before september 11th if he was 'so important' to clinton?"Um, I heard about him. In fact when I saw the second hit live, that was my first thought. It's that USS Cole mother f**ker. But why wasn't there anything in the news in the late nineties? Well there was, but the majority of the headlines were stolen from the BJ smear campaign. Which admitedly was Bills fault for getting himeself in the predicament. His bad decision was used by the partisans to limit his ability to perform in other ways.
For your information, I hacked satellite dish systems and I had Fauxnews for many years. I now have s**tty cable and I no longer watch news, I get all my news from the net.And I will not block this guy, because if I do, how will I vote him down?
I think what pee'd off Clinton was the deflection, not the indictment. In other words, all Presidents are criticized by Monday morning quarterbacks. It goes with the territory. It's Bush and his gang's orchestrated efforts to use the criticism as a smoke screen to hide their own failures that really has gotten Clinton going on the offensive.
lucidmattSep 24, 2006
Dugg up and applauded. I'm not registered for either party, but I supported Clinton, and I agree. He was hamstrung by Wag the Dog comments, but he also put himself in a position for them to be made. *we may differ here but...*The man HAD to know an entire political machine was geared up to get him. Christ, he was messing about with Monica while the I.C. was going on. At least FDR had the brains to keep his mistress discreet. Hell, he died in her bed, but you don't see anyone claim he got involved in WWII to distract anyone from finding out about her....
Closed AccountSep 24, 2006
<a class="user" href="http://www.youneocons.justgotowned.com">http://www.youneocons.justgotowned.com</a>sorry I can't help it.
dfragSep 25, 2006
Fox News is only a vowel movement away from what they actually doing to the news.
dmh11686Sep 25, 2006
Once again, you did not respond to Neal Gabler or fox giving Alan Colmes a radio show. Or the liberal democrats that are on Fox News. I looked up the equal time thing, which are mostly from liberal media watch dog groups like media matters, which is real credible(not), or FAIR, same lack of credibility. Brit Hume is one of the most respected journalist like I said. He even received the 2004 broadcaster of the year award. And he worked as the chief white house correspondent of ABC for years. Chris Wallace also worked for ABC for 15 years and for NBC as their chief white house correspondent during the 1980's. And also has received many awards for journalism.The reason I mentioned Keith Olbermann was because you were suggesting since Brit has republicans during the very short interview segment on his show that he loses credibility. A very short segment does not make his whole show biased. Keith Olbermann has all democrats on and liberals seem to think that he is the best thing since Edward R. Murrow.For you to say that the democrats on Fox are not liberal enough is your problem. They are there and they present their views. And I don't work for Fox, am not a troll, and simply defend FoxNews when it is unfairly criticized.
bruflethSep 25, 2006
I think its the smirk that the current administration has adopted. Even Rice did it during an interview on 60 Minutes last night. It just comes off as really skeezy.Oh and they lie and dodge and then lie again. They've taken advantage of immediate distribution such that any fact checking always comes well after their lies have been accepted as fact.
horseshoeSep 25, 2006
Guys, just block Zethris, It is widely known that he is a f**king moron that always spews innacuracies...You respond to him, and you simply give him more folks looking at what stupid s**t he posted. Just block him and talk to real people, not this shill.
tehnicoSep 26, 2006
@xen0blue"Why was there ever anything in the news about him trying to catch him if he was 'trying so hard'? Why hadn't anyone ever heard of bin laden before september 11th if he was 'so important' to clinton?"Um, I heard about him. In fact when I saw the second hit live, that was my first thought. It's that USS Cole mother f**ker. But why wasn't there anything in the news in the late nineties? Well there was, but the majority of the headlines were stolen from the BJ smear campaign. Which admitedly was Bills fault for getting himeself in the predicament. His bad decision was used by the partisans to limit his ability to perform in other ways.
Closed AccountSep 26, 2006
For your information, I hacked satellite dish systems and I had Fauxnews for many years. I now have s**tty cable and I no longer watch news, I get all my news from the net.And I will not block this guy, because if I do, how will I vote him down?
jd111Sep 27, 2006
I think what pee'd off Clinton was the deflection, not the indictment. In other words, all Presidents are criticized by Monday morning quarterbacks. It goes with the territory. It's Bush and his gang's orchestrated efforts to use the criticism as a smoke screen to hide their own failures that really has gotten Clinton going on the offensive.