I have got to be honest, that is a pretty s**t reply. You made no effort to address his claims and completely changed the subject. You should take a lesson from the parent.
Err no it doesn't. Todays build of webkit gets RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)--------------------------------------------Total: 1638.6ms +/- 0.6%--------------------------------------------Now that is impressive and it is pretty damn stable but fook me, Yesterdays build hit 1868ms and that was fast. But todays build is blistering, if you think chrome is fast get todays build of webkit to see fast web browsing can be/will be. i have no doubt webkit will be the first sub 1000ms browser.
@str1fe;Yes, sorry, that was for Windows. I'm sure that there is a very similar switch that you can use for other OS's, after all, it is the same application.
getrdone656Sep 7, 2008
assh**efever > assh**efever YOU DIVIDED BY ZERO OH SHI.....
theabdboySep 7, 2008
BeastTube>RedTube
strypersarmySep 7, 2008
i use that all the time and it doesnt work :(
smillsSep 7, 2008
I have got to be honest, that is a pretty s**t reply. You made no effort to address his claims and completely changed the subject. You should take a lesson from the parent.
burjzyntskiSep 8, 2008
I digg you for introduction to pornhub.
bossniggaSep 9, 2008
Err no it doesn't. Todays build of webkit gets RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)--------------------------------------------Total: 1638.6ms +/- 0.6%--------------------------------------------Now that is impressive and it is pretty damn stable but fook me, Yesterdays build hit 1868ms and that was fast. But todays build is blistering, if you think chrome is fast get todays build of webkit to see fast web browsing can be/will be. i have no doubt webkit will be the first sub 1000ms browser.
Closed AccountSep 10, 2008
@str1fe;Yes, sorry, that was for Windows. I'm sure that there is a very similar switch that you can use for other OS's, after all, it is the same application.