huffingtonpost.com — Chris Matthew started off the Pennsylvania primary coverage with a bang tonight. Shortly after 6, seated by co-anchor Keith Olbermann, Matthews called the primary, and thus his coverage tonight, basically moot. "This contest is essentially over," he proclaims to Keith. "Barack Obama is going to win the most elected delegates."
Apr 22, 2008 View in Crawl 4
mojiraApr 23, 2008
He is very obviously probama, but in his defense... f**k Hillary.
oneandonlysnobApr 23, 2008
20? She now needs 69% on average to catch up, which means she must win every upcoming state by almost a 40 point margin. It was a 30 point margin, much more than 20, before her so-called win in Pennsylvania.
Closed AccountApr 24, 2008
weak, chris is the media. if for some reason he thinks that hes not a shill out of the blue, he will have to do more than say the media has staged it. they staged it so that he could talk about it sell it on the "news" channel.the tv news shows make up the news to sell the advertisements. this is all commentary, there hasnt been news from this liars for years.keith, its either all the way or not, he's stilla shill too. and a special comment from me, f**k you and call out the system for what it is a sham. the elections are now specticals like the playoffs and we cheer for someone to lead us to our destruction. Long live america, where you are a true patriot, as long as you act and say only good things, because god forbid you critisise the chosen race.
Closed AccountApr 24, 2008
This is exactly what happens when otherwise normal people become complete dumbf**ks after getting hit by Hillary's "Freakin Lazar Stupidity Ray Gun of Death...Machine"!!!!
stilesjaApr 24, 2008
In truth, Hillary's primary argument is that the John Edwards votes are going to her rather than them being split 50/50 between her and Obama. Making this argument says "Look, all those decisive Obama victories early on were because Edwards was splitting my vote. Now that Edwards is out Obama can't win a primary decisively and that should tell the super delegates that the people want Hillary".I've never heard it actually said that way, but to me this can be the only thing she is thinking, otherwise why stay in the race?
lellyshubbyApr 25, 2008
I have to disagree. I think that there is just as much hate from Repubs toward Obama. Look at the new ad in NC that the GOP launched. You think they would let him get elected without a TON more of these ads? They specifically brought back the guy that ran the 'Willie Horton' ads that killed Dukakis' bid. As much as I like Obama, I just see way too many ways he can be beaten by doubts. Yes, there's alot Repubs would try to stick to Hillary but she has an easy rebuttal. She's not Bill. She didn't have any official powers during his time in office. Other than sticking by him while he screw the majority of fat DC interns, they really would not have much over her. Plus, she doesn't look like a push-over like Obama does by not going for the throat ala John Kerry. But that's just my two cents.
lellyshubbyApr 26, 2008
a ten point win didn't hurt her, it just didn't help her as much mathematically as she really needed. Your statement sounds far-fetched as worded. A victory no matter how small gives her a boost in ratings and creates doubt in voters minds that Obama can't seal the deal. Now with MI and FL delegations being decided, his win isn't for sure, it's not even guaranteed now. She could still steal this especially now that she has the GOP running Ayers, Wright, Rezko ads. And you can all blame her for staying in it to win it or you can be honest and see that he didn't take care of business and deserves the loss if it should happen. Seriously, you can't claim to be the next JFK with skeletons in your closet WORSE than Dubya's.
jakobvirgilMay 9, 2008
How did Obama act irresponsibly By running while Black?-Jake